Intradonor reproducibility and changes in hemolytic variables during RBC storage: a common mistake in reproducibility analysis
- PMID: 31374149
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.15400
Intradonor reproducibility and changes in hemolytic variables during RBC storage: a common mistake in reproducibility analysis
Comment in
-
In response.Transfusion. 2019 Aug;59(8):2750-2751. doi: 10.1111/trf.15418. Transfusion. 2019. PMID: 31374152 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Intradonor reproducibility and changes in hemolytic variables during red blood cell storage: results of recall phase of the REDS-III RBC-Omics study.Transfusion. 2019 Jan;59(1):79-88. doi: 10.1111/trf.14987. Epub 2018 Nov 8. Transfusion. 2019. PMID: 30408207 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Lanteri MC, Kanias T, Keating S, et al. Intradonor reproducibility and changes in hemolytic variables during red blood cell storage: results of recall phase of the REDS-III RBC-Omics study. Transfusion 2019;59:79-88.
-
- Lawrence I, Lin K. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255-68.
-
- Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology Beyond the Basics. 3rd ed. New York: Jones and Bartlett Publisher; 2014.
-
- Sabour S. Reliability of automatic vibratory equipment for ultrasonic strain measurement of the median nerve: common mistake. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015;41:1119-20.
-
- Sabour S. Reliability of immunocytochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization on fine-needle aspiration cytology samples of breast cancers: methodological issues. Diagn Cytopathol 2016;44:1128-9.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
