Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e027743.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743.

Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review

Affiliations

Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review

Duncan Chambers et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: In England, the NHS111 service provides assessment and triage by telephone for urgent health problems. A digital version of this service has recently been introduced. We aimed to systematically review the evidence on digital and online symptom checkers and similar services.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Management Information Consortium, Web of Science and ACM Digital Library up to April 2018, supplemented by phrase searches for known symptom checkers and citation searching of key studies.

Eligibility criteria: Studies of any design that evaluated a digital or online symptom checker or health assessment service for people seeking advice about an urgent health problem.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction and quality assessment (using the Cochrane Collaboration version of QUADAS for diagnostic accuracy studies and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute tool for observational studies) were done by one reviewer with a sample checked for accuracy and consistency. We performed a narrative synthesis of the included studies structured around pre-defined research questions and key outcomes.

Results: We included 29 publications (27 studies). Evidence on patient safety was weak. Diagnostic accuracy varied between different systems but was generally low. Algorithm-based triage tended to be more risk averse than that of health professionals. There was very limited evidence on patients' compliance with online triage advice. Study participants generally expressed high levels of satisfaction, although in mainly uncontrolled studies. Younger and more highly educated people were more likely to use these services.

Conclusions: The English 'digital 111' service has been implemented against a background of uncertainty around the likely impact on important outcomes. The health system may need to respond to short-term changes and/or shifts in demand. The popularity of online and digital services with younger and more educated people has implications for health equity.

Prospero registration number: CRD42018093564.

Keywords: symptom checkers; systematic reviews; urgent care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NHS England. NHS 111 minimum data set 2018-19. 2018. https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/nhs-111-min... (accessed 29 Oct 2018).
    1. NHS England. Five year forward view. NHS England: Leeds, 2014.
    1. NHS England. Next steps on the NHS Five Year Forward View. NHS England: Leeds, 2017.
    1. NHS England. Sustainability and transformation partnerships. 2019. https://www.england.nhs.uk/integratedcare/stps/ (accessed 25 Mar 2019).
    1. Turner J, O’Cathain A, Knowles E, et al. . Impact of the urgent care telephone service NHS 111 pilot sites: a controlled before and after study. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003451 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003451 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types