Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct;68(10):1689-1700.
doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02373-1. Epub 2019 Aug 3.

Tumor-induced escape mechanisms and their association with resistance to checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Affiliations
Review

Tumor-induced escape mechanisms and their association with resistance to checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Michael Friedrich et al. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Immunotherapy aims to activate the immune system to fight cancer in a very specific and targeted manner. Despite the success of different immunotherapeutic strategies, in particular antibodies directed against checkpoints as well as adoptive T-cell therapy, the response of patients is limited in different types of cancers. This attributes to escape of the tumor from immune surveillance and development of acquired resistances during therapy. In this review, the different evasion and resistance mechanisms that limit the efficacy of immunotherapies targeting tumor-associated antigens presented by major histocompatibility complex molecules on the surface of the malignant cells are summarized. Overcoming these escape mechanisms is a great challenge, but might lead to a better clinical outcome of patients and is therefore currently a major focus of research.

Keywords: Immune escape; Immunotherapy; MHC; Resistance; TIMO XIV; Tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Tumor escape mechanisms. Different immune escape strategies of tumors discussed in the review are depicted. The figure shows mechanisms based on a epigenetic modifications (e.g., histone acetylation, DNA methylation); b regulation at the transcriptional level (e.g., for MHC class I, selected transcription factors and promoter motifs are shown); c post-transcriptional regulation by miRNAs or RBPs; d reduced classical MHC class I surface expression; e impaired IFN-γ signaling pathway; f expression of immune inhibitory molecules and/or g establishment of an immunosuppressive TME. h Novel factors identified in the regulation of MHC class I surface expression
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Resistance mechanisms to cancer immunotherapy. The schematic diagram summarizes the main mechanisms involved in adaptive and acquired resistance to different immunotherapies including iCPI

References

    1. Leone P, et al. MHC class I antigen processing and presenting machinery: organization, function, and defects in tumor cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(16):1172–1187. - PubMed
    1. Zanker D, Chen W. Standard and immunoproteasomes show similar peptide degradation specificities. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44(12):3500–3503. - PubMed
    1. Saveanu L, et al. Concerted peptide trimming by human ERAP1 and ERAP2 aminopeptidase complexes in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(7):689–697. - PubMed
    1. Norbury CC, Eisenlohr LC. Editorial overview: antigen processing. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016;40:5–6. - PubMed
    1. Mintern JD, Macri C, Villadangos JA. Modulation of antigen presentation by intracellular trafficking. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;34:16–21. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances