Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan-Feb;77(1):144-149.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

Impact of Resident and Fellow Participation on Surgical Outcomes in Breast Conserving Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Impact of Resident and Fellow Participation on Surgical Outcomes in Breast Conserving Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer

Marissa K Srour et al. J Surg Educ. 2020 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Few studies examine the impact of surgical trainee involvement on tumor-free margins in breast conserving surgery (BCS). Our objective was to investigate the impact of resident and fellow involvement on positive margins rates following BCS for invasive breast cancer (BC).

Design: We identified female patients who had BCS for BC between January 2005 to December 2015.

Setting: Tertiary care hospital.

Participants: Around 1089 patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database.

Results: Of 1089 patients, mean age was 63 (range 43-99) years. Around 768 patients (70.1%) required preoperative localization, and 328 patients (29.9%) had a palpable cancer. Nonpalpable cancers had a smaller volume of specimen tissue excised (p = 0.0005) compared to palpable cancers, and no significant difference was observed in the positive margin rate between the nonpalpable group compared to the palpable group (24.7% nonpalpable vs. 25.3% palpable, p = 0.88). Nonpalpable cancer positive margin rates were 23.9% (n = 102/427) for cases performed by an attending surgeon, 25.0% (n = 15/60) with a junior resident (PGY 2-3), 28.6% (n = 8/28) with a senior resident (PGY 4-5), and 25.7% (n = 65/253) with a fellow, which were not statistically significant (p = 0.89). Palpable cancer positive margin rates were 27.6% (n = 47/170) for cases performed by an attending, 13.9% (n = 5/36) with an intern (PGY-1), 40.9% (n = 9/22) with a junior resident, 0% (n = 0/8) with a senior resident, and 23.9% (n = 22/92) with a fellow, which were also not significantly different (p = 0.07).

Conclusion: Resident and fellow participation in BCS for BC does not appear to impact the rate of positive margins.

Keywords: Breast conserving surgery; Medical Knowledge; Patient Care; Positive margin rates; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Resident education; Surgical trainee.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources