Serum levels of ANOS1 serve as a diagnostic biomarker of gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter observational study
- PMID: 31377880
- DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-00995-z
Serum levels of ANOS1 serve as a diagnostic biomarker of gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter observational study
Abstract
Background: Development of high-performance serum biomarkers will likely improve treatment outcomes of patients with gastric cancer (GC). We previously identified the candidate serum markers, anosmin 1 (ANOS1), dihydropyrimidinase-like 3 (DPYSL3), and melanoma-associated antigen D2 (MAGE-D2) and evaluated their clinical significance through a single-center retrospective analysis. Here we conducted a prospective multicenter observational study aimed at validating the diagnostic performance of these potential markers.
Methods: We analyzed serum levels before and after surgery of the three potential biomarkers in patients with GC and healthy volunteers. Quantification of serum and GC tissue levels was performed using an ELISA.
Results: Area under the curve (AUC) values that discriminated patients with GC from healthy controls were - 0.7058, 0.6188, and 0.5031 for ANOS1, DPYSL3, and MAGED2, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the ANOS1 assay were 0.36 and 0.85, respectively. The AUC value of ANOS1 that discriminated patients with stage I GC from healthy controls was 0.7131. Serum ANOS1 levels were significantly elevated in patients with stage I GC compared with those of healthy controls (median 1179 ng/ml and 461 ng/ml, respectively, P < 0.0001) and decreased after resection of primary GC lesions (P < 0.0001). The combination of serum ANOS1 and DPYSL3 levels increased the AUC value that discriminated patients with GC from healthy controls. Serum levels of ANOS1 did not significantly correlate with those of carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, or other markers of inflammation.
Conclusions: Serum levels of ANOS1 may serve as a useful diagnostic tool for managing GC.
Keywords: Diagnosis; Gastric cancer; Prospective study; Serum biomarker.
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - DOI
-
- Van Cutsem E, Sagaert X, Topal B, Haustermans K, Prenen H. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2016;388:2654–64. - DOI
-
- Kanda M, Kodera Y. Recent advances in the molecular diagnostics of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:9838–52. - DOI
-
- Ito M, Oshima Y, Yajima S, Suzuki T, Nanami T, Shiratori F, et al. Is high serum programmed death ligand 1 level a risk factor for poor survival in patients with gastric cancer? Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018;2:313–8. - DOI
-
- Park DJ, Seo AN, Yoon C, Ku GY, Coit DG, Strong VE, et al. Serum VEGF-A and tumor vessel VEGFR-2 levels predict survival in Caucasian but not Asian patients undergoing resection for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Suppl 3):S1508–S15151515. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous