Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 16:10:765.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00765. eCollection 2019.

Identification of High Risk Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Multimodal Vascular and Perfusion Imaging Study

Affiliations

Identification of High Risk Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Multimodal Vascular and Perfusion Imaging Study

Moo-Seok Park et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Risk stratification of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) is still an issue for carotid revascularization. We sought to identify factors associated with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (SCAS) using multimodal imaging techniques. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent carotid artery revascularization. Results from duplex sonography, computerized tomography angiography, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), perfusion-weighted imaging, and demographic profiles were compared between ACAS and SCAS patients. Differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups were balanced by the propensity matching score method. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with symptomaticity of carotid artery stenosis. We compared the strength of associations between significant imaging factors and symptomatic carotid stenosis using C statistics. Results: A total of 259 patients (asymptomatic 57.1%, symptomatic 42.9%) with carotid stenosis were included. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the multivariable regression analysis revealed that the absence of plaque calcification [Odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.182-0.870, p = 0.023], deep white matter hyperintensity (DWMH; Odds ratio 3.46, 95% CI 1.842-6.682, p < 0.001), susceptibility vessel sign seen on gradient-echo MRI (Odds ratio 2.35, 95% CI 1.113-5.107, p = 0.027), and increased cerebral blood volume (CBV) seen on perfusion-weighted MRI (CBV; Odds ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.075-4.454, p = 0.032) were associated with SCAS. The combination of these variables had a fair accuracy to classify SCAS (Area under the curve 0.733, 95% CI 0.662-0.803). Conclusions: We identified several multimodal imaging markers independently associated with SCAS. These markers may provide information to identify ACAS patients with high risk of ischemic stroke. Future studies are needed to predict SCAS using our findings in other independent cohorts.

Keywords: asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis; multimodal imaging; perfusion-weighted MRI; risk factors; symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Imaging parameters: MRI, CTA/MRA, PWI, and carotid duplex sonography. MRA shows stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery (A, white arrow) and contralateral carotid artery stenosis (A, black arrow). In PWI, increased CBV (B) and delayed TTP (C) are shown. FLAIR shows HVS in FLAIR (D) and PWMH/DWMH (F). GRE shows HV in GRE (E). Through duplex carotid sonography, plaque characteristics such as calcification, ulceration, echolucent, and stenosis are shown (G,H).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The accuracy of differentiating SCAS from ACAS was measured using several combination of factors associated SCAS: ROC curve of DWMH alone (blue line), DWMH and absent plaque calcification (orange line), DWMH, absent plaque calcification, and GRE HV sign (green line), and DWMH, absent plaque calcification, GRE HV sign, and increased cerebral blood volume (black line). The combination of all four factors (black line) yielded the best accuracy. AUC indicates area under the ROC curve; CI, confidence interval; p, p-value comparing the two AUCs.

References

    1. Gorelick PB, Wong KS, Bae HJ, Pandey DK. Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: a large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier. Stroke. (2008) 39:2396–9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505776 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ, Appel LJ, Braun LT, Chaturvedi S, et al. . Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. (2011) 42:517–84. 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181fcb238 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halliday A, Harrison M, Hayter E, Kong X, Mansfield A, Marro J, et al. . 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. (2010) 376:1074–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61197-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Autret A, Pourcelot L, Saudeau D, Marchal C, Bertrand P, de Boisvilliers S. Stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis. Lancet. (1987) 1:888–90. 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)92861-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA. (1995) 273:1421–8. 10.1001/jama.273.18.1421 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources