Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 18:5:17.
doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.06.01. eCollection 2019.

Methods, system errors, and demographic differences in participant errors using daily text message-based short message service computer-assisted self-interview (SMS-CASI) to measure sexual risk behavior in a RCT of HIV self-test use

William Brown 3rd  1   2   3   4 , Alan Sheinfil  5 , Javier Lopez-Rios  4   6 , Rebecca Giguere  4 , Curtis Dolezal  4 , Timothy Frasca  4 , Cody Lentz  4 , Iván C Balán  4 , Christine Rael  4 , Catherine Cruz Torres  7 , Raynier Crespo  7 , Irma Febo  7 , Alex Carballo-Diéguez  4
Affiliations

Methods, system errors, and demographic differences in participant errors using daily text message-based short message service computer-assisted self-interview (SMS-CASI) to measure sexual risk behavior in a RCT of HIV self-test use

William Brown 3rd et al. Mhealth. .

Abstract

Background: Assessment of sexual risk behavior is crucial to HIV prevention trials. Currently, there are no biomarkers or objective measures to detect and characterize sexual risk behavior; therefore, we must rely on self-reports. Self-report accuracy may be improved by collecting data in real-time. Our objective was to demonstrate how a text message-based short message service computer-assisted self-interview (SMS-CASI) system can collect daily sexual risk behavior data.

Methods: During the course of a 2-arm randomized controlled trial, confidential daily SMS-CASI was used to assess sexual risk behavior over three months for participants using only condoms in the control condition and using condoms and HIV self-tests to test themselves and their non-monogamous sexual partner over six months for participants in the intervention condition (total N=272). Active monitoring of participants responses and data cleaning took place concurrently with trial execution. Descriptive statistics were used to examine frequencies related to system functionality, participant reporting, system errors, communication patterns, and overall feasibility of using the SMS-CASI system for reporting sexual risk behavior.

Results: The SMS-CASI system processed 272,565 messages. In addition, 87 classifications of metadata were collected, for a total of 22,895,460 different data points. Types of messages included these sent (N=171,749; 63.01%) to participants, received (N=100,646; 36.93%) from participants, and failed (N=168; 0.06%) to be sent. Most errors (N=1,858) were due to system malfunctions (N=535; 28.79%) or participants' mistakes (N=1,289; 69.38%). Participant errors included: wrong password, incomplete surveys, and invalid response. The highest error rates by demographic characteristics were by age among older participants [ages 30-39; 383 errors (29.71%), and 40-69; 545 errors (42.28%)] and by race among Hispanic/Latino participants [487 errors (37.78%)].

Conclusions: The SMS-CASI system was effective at confidentially collecting sexual risk behavior data on a daily basis, potentially contributing to reduced recall and social desirability bias. This study provides methodological examples and data demonstrating how SMS-CASI can be used for sexual health data collection.

Keywords: HIV home testing; computer-assisted self-interview (CASI); mHealth; text messaging short message service (SMS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SMS-CASI micro-questionnaire tree. SMS-CASI, short message service computer-assisted self-interview.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participant retention.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Communication examples.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Duda SN, McGowan CC, Gadd CS. Perceived Reasons for High and Low Quality Observational HIV Research Data. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015;216:994. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Althubaiti A. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc 2016;9:211-7. 10.2147/JMDH.S104807 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fincher D, VanderEnde K, Colbert K, et al. Effect of face-to-face interview versus computer-assisted self-interview on disclosure of intimate partner violence among African American women in WIC clinics. J Interpers Violence 2015;30:818-38. 10.1177/0886260514536280 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McNeely J, Strauss SM, Rotrosen J, et al. Validation of an audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) version of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST) in primary care patients. Addiction 2016;111:233-44. 10.1111/add.13165 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spear SE, Shedlin M, Gilberti B, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of an audio computer-assisted self-interview version of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) in primary care patients. Subst Abus 2016;37:299-305. 10.1080/08897077.2015.1062460 - DOI - PMC - PubMed