Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S19-S24.
doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.04.

Interbody options in lumbar fusion

Affiliations
Review

Interbody options in lumbar fusion

Dil V Patel et al. J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Interbody devices have revolutionized lumbar fusion surgery by enhancing mechanical stability, optimizing sagittal parameters, and maximizing fusion potential. There are several lumbar interbody fusion approaches available for varying pathologic etiologies, surgical index levels, or due to surgeon preference. With the advancement of spinal instrumentation and interbody devices, a variety of cage materials and dimensions have been engineered to accommodate various lumbar fusion approaches. The efficacy of a fusion is dependent on the shape, size, and material makeup of that interbody device. Since there are numerous cages available in today's market, it is important to find the optimal cage to best accommodate specific lumbar fusion cases. This review will explain the properties and future advancements of various interbody devices available for lumbar fusions.

Keywords: Interbody devices; bone grafts; lumbar fusion; osteobiologics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. de Kunder SL, Rijkers K, Caelers I, et al. Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Historical Overview and a Future Perspective. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018;43:1161-8. 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002534 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang H, Chen W, Jiang J, et al. Analysis of the correlative factors in the selection of interbody fusion cage height in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016;17:9. 10.1186/s12891-016-0866-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 2015;1:2-18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu DS, Walker CT, Godzik J, et al. Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review. Ann Transl Med 2018;6:104. 10.21037/atm.2018.03.24 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Attenello J, Chang C, Lee YP, et al. Comparison of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with open versus percutaneous screw fixation for adult degenerative scoliosis. J Orthop 2018;15:486-9. 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed