Effect of a Professional Coaching Intervention on the Well-being and Distress of Physicians: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 31380892
- PMCID: PMC6686971
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2425
Effect of a Professional Coaching Intervention on the Well-being and Distress of Physicians: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: Burnout symptoms among physicians are common and have potentially serious ramifications for physicians and their patients. Randomized studies testing interventions to address burnout have been uncommon.
Objective: To explore the effect of individualized coaching on the well-being of physicians.
Design, setting, and participants: A pilot randomized clinical trial involving 88 practicing physicians in the departments of medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics who volunteered for coaching was conducted between October 9, 2017, and March 27, 2018, at Mayo Clinic sites in Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Statistical analysis was conducted from August 24, 2018, to March 25, 2019.
Interventions: A total of 6 coaching sessions facilitated by a professional coach.
Main outcomes and measures: Burnout, quality of life, resilience, job satisfaction, engagement, and meaning at work using established metrics. Analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis.
Results: Among the 88 physicians in the study (48 women and 40 men), after 6 months of professional coaching, emotional exhaustion decreased by a mean (SD) of 5.2 (8.7) points in the intervention group compared with an increase of 1.5 (7.7) points in the control group by the end of the study (P < .001). Absolute rates of high emotional exhaustion at 5 months decreased by 19.5% in the intervention group and increased by 9.8% in the control group (-29.3% [95% CI, -34.0% to -24.6%]) (P < .001). Absolute rates of overall burnout at 5 months also decreased by 17.1% in the intervention group and increased by 4.9% in the control group (-22.0% [95% CI, -25.2% to -18.7%]) (P < .001). Quality of life improved by a mean (SD) of 1.2 (2.5) points in the intervention group compared with 0.1 (1.7) points in the control group (1.1 points [95% CI, 0.04-2.1 points]) (P = .005), and resilience scores improved by a mean (SD) of 1.3 (5.2) points in the intervention group compared with 0.6 (4.0) points in the control group (0.7 points [95% CI, 0.0-3.0 points]) (P = .04). No statistically significant differences in depersonalization, job satisfaction, engagement, or meaning in work were observed.
Conclusions and relevance: Professional coaching may be an effective way to reduce emotional exhaustion and overall burnout as well as improve quality of life and resilience for some physicians.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03207581.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Address Physician Burnout by Restoring Control of Health Care to Physicians.JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):334. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6007. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32011631 No abstract available.
-
Address Physician Burnout By Restoring Control of Health Care to Physicians-Reply.JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):334-335. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6004. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32011636 No abstract available.
References
-
- Shanafelt TD, Hasan O, Dyrbye LN, et al. . Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014 [published correction appears in Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(2):276]. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(12):1600-1613. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.023 - DOI - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical