Are older and seriously ill inpatients planning ahead for future medical care?
- PMID: 31382893
- PMCID: PMC6683455
- DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1211-2
Are older and seriously ill inpatients planning ahead for future medical care?
Abstract
Background: Despite the perceived ethical, personal and health service benefits of advance care planning (ACP), the extent to which older and seriously ill Australian inpatients have considered future health decisions remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine in a sample of older and seriously ill inpatients, the proportion who had: 1) engaged in four advance care planning (ACP) activities; 2) not engaged in ACP activities but wanted to; and 3) reasons why they had not engaged.
Methods: Cross-sectional face-to-face standardised interview survey with inpatients in a tertiary referral centre who were either: aged 80+ years; aged 55+ years with progressive chronic disease(s); or judged by treating clinicians as having a life expectancy of less than 12 months. Patients indicated whether they had engaged in four ACP activities: (1) appointed medical substitute-decision-maker(s), (2) recorded end-of-life wishes in an advance directive or care plan; and talked about their end-of-life wishes with their: (3) support persons and/or (4) doctors. Patients who had not engaged in activities were asked whether they wished this to occur and reasons why.
Results: One hundred eighty-six inpatients consented to the study (80% of approached). Of these, 9% (n = 16) had engaged in four ACP activities; 27% (n = 50) had not engaged in any. Half (n = 94, 52%) had appointed a medical substitute-decision-maker, 27% (n = 50) had recorded wishes in an advance directive or care plan, 51% (n = 90) had talked about their end-of-life wishes with support persons and 27% (n = 48) had talked with their doctor. Patients who wanted to, but had not, engaged in the four ACP activities were unaware they could record wishes or appoint decision-makers, or indicated providers had not initiated conversations.
Conclusion: Relatively few inpatients had engaged in all four ACP activities. More inpatients had discussed end of life issues with family and appointed substitute decision makers, than completed written documents or talked with doctors. Community education and a more active role for community and hospital-based providers in supporting patients and families to collaboratively resolve end-of-life decisions may increase the probability wishes are known and followed.
Keywords: Acute care; Advance care planning; End-of-life.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Medical oncology outpatients' preferences and experiences with advanced care planning: a cross-sectional study.BMC Cancer. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5272-6. BMC Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30642289 Free PMC article.
-
Family Caregivers' Characterization of Conversations Following an ACP Event.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Sep;35(9):1161-1167. doi: 10.1177/1049909118760302. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018. PMID: 30071784 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Older patient engagement in advance care planning in Canadian primary care practices: Results of a multisite survey.Can Fam Physician. 2018 May;64(5):371-377. Can Fam Physician. 2018. PMID: 29760260 Free PMC article.
-
Planning ahead with dementia: what role can advance care planning play? A review on opportunities and challenges.Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Dec 30;148:w14706. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14706. eCollection 2018 Dec 17. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018. PMID: 30594990 Review.
-
Advance care planning in the elderly.Med Clin North Am. 2015 Mar;99(2):391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Dec 23. Med Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 25700590 Review.
Cited by
-
Decision-making conversations for life-sustaining treatment with seriously ill patients using a Danish version of the US POLST: a qualitative study of patient and physician experiences.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):57-66. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036481. Epub 2022 Feb 11. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022. PMID: 35148663 Free PMC article.
-
The intricacy of interactions: qualitative exploration of preferences and perceptions of advance care planning among healthcare professionals, patients and those close to them.Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Nov 30;16:26323524221139879. doi: 10.1177/26323524221139879. eCollection 2022. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022. PMID: 36466760 Free PMC article.
-
Limitation of life-sustaining treatment and patient involvement in decision-making: a retrospective study of a Danish COVID-19 patient cohort.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 20;29(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00984-1. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34930420 Free PMC article.
-
Co-designing an intervention to increase uptake of advance care planning in later life following emergency hospitalisation: a research protocol using accelerated experience-based co-design (AEBCD) and the behaviour change wheel (BCW).BMJ Open. 2022 May 19;12(5):e055347. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055347. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35589349 Free PMC article.
-
Advance Care Planning Initiatives in Critical Care Centers in Japan: A Case Report.Clin Case Rep. 2025 Jan 7;13(1):e9703. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9703. eCollection 2025 Jan. Clin Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 39780906 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sudore RL, Lum HD, You JJ, Hanson LC, Meier DE, Pantilat SZ, Matlock DD, Rietjens JAC, Korfage IJ, Ritchie CS, et al. Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition from a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2017;53(5):821–832. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rietjens JAC, Sudore RL, Connolly M, van Delden JJ, Drickamer MA, Droger M, van der Heide A, Heyland DK, Houttekier D, Janssen DJA, et al. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):e543–e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sudore Rebecca L., Heyland Daren K., Lum Hillary D., Rietjens Judith A.C., Korfage Ida J., Ritchie Christine S., Hanson Laura C., Meier Diane E., Pantilat Steven Z., Lorenz Karl, Howard Michelle, Green Michael J., Simon Jessica E., Feuz Mariko A., You John J. Outcomes That Define Successful Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Panel Consensus. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2018;55(2):245-255.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources