NightBalance Sleep Position Treatment Device Versus Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- PMID: 31383231
- PMCID: PMC6622520
- DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.7868
NightBalance Sleep Position Treatment Device Versus Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Abstract
Study objectives: Compare treatment efficacy and objective adherence between the NightBalance sleep position treatment (SPT) device and auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP) in patients with exclusive positional obstructive sleep apnea (ePOSA) defined as a supine apnea-hypopnea index (sAHI) ≥ 2 times the nonsupine AHI (nsAHI) and a nsAHI < 10 events/h.
Methods: This prospective multicenter randomized crossover trial enrolled treatment naive participants with ePOSA (AHI ≥ 15 events/h and nsAHI < 10 events/h) or (AHI > 10 and < 15 events/h with daytime sleepiness and nsAH < 5 events/h). Polysomnography and objective adherence determination (device data) were performed at the end of each 6-week treatment. Patient device preference was determined at the end of the study.
Results: A total of 117 participants were randomized (58 SPT first, 59 APAP first). Of these, 112 started treatment with the second device (adherence cohort) and 110 completed the study (AHI cohort). The AHI on SPT was higher (mean ± standard deviation, 7.29 ± 6.8 versus 3.71 ± 5.1 events/h, P < .001). The mean AHI difference (SPT-APAP) was 3.58 events/h with a one sided 95% confidence interval upper bound of 4.96 events/h (< the prestudy noninferiority margin of 5 events/h). The average nightly adherence (all nights) was greater on SPT (345.3 ± 111.22 versus 286.98 ± 128.9 minutes, P < .0001). Participants found the SPT to be more comfortable and easier to use and 53% reported a preference for SPT assuming both devices were equally effective.
Conclusions: Treatment with SPT resulted in non-inferior treatment efficacy and greater adherence compared to APAP in ePOSA suggesting that SPT is an effective treatment for this group.
Clinical trial registration: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Title: The POSAtive Study: Study for the Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea; Identifier: NCT03061071; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03061071.
Keywords: continuous positive airway pressure; obstructive sleep apnea; position treatment.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Sleep Medicine. All rights reserved.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparing the Efficacy, Mask Leak, Patient Adherence, and Patient Preference of Three Different CPAP Interfaces to Treat Moderate-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Jan 15;14(1):101-108. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6892. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018. PMID: 29198305 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term use of a nasal expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) device as a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).J Clin Sleep Med. 2011 Oct 15;7(5):449-53B. doi: 10.5664/JCSM.1304. J Clin Sleep Med. 2011. PMID: 22003339 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term effectiveness and compliance of positional therapy with the sleep position trainer in the treatment of positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.Sleep. 2014 Jul 1;37(7):1209-15. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3840. Sleep. 2014. PMID: 25061249 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Heated humidification did not improve compliance of positive airway pressure and subjective daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0207994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207994. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30517168 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative efficacy of sleep positional therapy, oral appliance therapy, and CPAP in obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis of mean changes in key outcomes.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 3;12:1517274. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1517274. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 39963428 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The Effects of Barbed Repositioning Pharyngoplasty in Positional and Non-Positional OSA Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 15;11(22):6749. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226749. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36431226 Free PMC article.
-
Positional therapy: is it ready for prime time?J Clin Sleep Med. 2025 Feb 1;21(2):221-222. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11510. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025. PMID: 39625191 No abstract available.
-
International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023 Jul;13(7):1061-1482. doi: 10.1002/alr.23079. Epub 2023 Mar 30. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023. PMID: 36068685 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-inferiority of sleep position therapy compared to positive airway pressure therapy with regard to daytime sleepiness in patients with mild to moderate position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised cross-over trial.Trials. 2025 Aug 18;26(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09007-1. Trials. 2025. PMID: 40826110 Free PMC article.
-
The Prevalence of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in a Sample of the Saudi Population.J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 Mar;13(1):129-139. doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00089-1. Epub 2023 Jan 27. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36705890 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical