Construct validation of machine learning in the prediction of short-term postoperative complications following total shoulder arthroplasty
- PMID: 31383411
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.017
Construct validation of machine learning in the prediction of short-term postoperative complications following total shoulder arthroplasty
Abstract
Background: We aimed to demonstrate that supervised machine learning (ML) models can better predict postoperative complications after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) than comorbidity indices.
Methods: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2005-2017 for TSA cases. Training and validation sets were created by randomly assigning 80% and 20% of the data set. Included variables were age, body mass index (BMI), operative time, smoking status, comorbidities, diagnosis, and preoperative hematocrit and albumin. Complications included any adverse event, transfusion, extended length of stay (>3 days), surgical site infection, return to the operating room, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, and readmission. Each SML algorithm was compared with one another and to a baseline model using American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. Model strength was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the positive predictive value (PPV) of complications.
Results: We identified a total of 17,119 TSA cases. Mean age, BMI, and length of stay were 69.5 ± 9.6 years, 31.1 ± 6.8, and 2.0 ± 2.2 days. Percentage hematocrit, BMI, and operative time were of highest importance in outcome prediction. SML algorithms outperformed ASA classification models for predicting any adverse event (71.0% vs. 63.0%), transfusion (77.0% vs. 64.0%), extended length of stay (68.0% vs. 60.0%), surgical site infection (65.0% vs. 58.0%), return to the operating room (59.0% vs. 54.0%), and readmission (64.0% vs. 58.0%). SML algorithms demonstrated the greatest PPV for any adverse event (62.5%), extended length of stay (61.4%), transfusion (52.2%), and readmission (10.1%). ASA classification had a 0.0% PPV for complications.
Conclusion: With continued validation, intelligent models could calculate patient-specific risk for complications to adjust perioperative care and site of surgery.
Keywords: Total shoulder arthroplasty; anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty; complication rate; machine learning; neural networks; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; risk assessment.
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
What Associations Exist Between Comorbidity Indices and Postoperative Adverse Events After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Apr;477(4):881-890. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000624. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 30614913 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning Algorithms Exceed Comorbidity Indices in Prediction of Short-Term Complications After Hip Fracture Surgery.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun 1;33(11):e633-e647. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01144. Epub 2024 Nov 19. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025. PMID: 39602701
-
Low Serum Albumin Levels are Associated with Increased 30-Day Cardiopulmonary Complications, Reoperation, and Readmission Rates Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Iowa Orthop J. 2019;39(2):27-34. Iowa Orthop J. 2019. PMID: 32577104 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative risk stratification tools for shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6):e293-e304. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.006. Epub 2023 Jan 5. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023. PMID: 36621747
-
Comorbidity scores reported in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.Int Orthop. 2022 Sep;46(9):2089-2095. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05462-6. Epub 2022 Jun 6. Int Orthop. 2022. PMID: 35666300
Cited by
-
Developing a machine learning algorithm to predict the probability of aseptic loosening of the glenoid component after anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: protocol for a retrospective, multicentre study.BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 18;13(10):e074700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074700. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37852772 Free PMC article.
-
Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2088-2101. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001343. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 32667760 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Risk After Knee/Hip Arthroplasty.Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296221139263. doi: 10.1177/10760296221139263. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023. PMID: 36596268 Free PMC article.
-
Navigating the future: A comprehensive review of technology in shoulder arthroplasty.J Hand Microsurg. 2025 Feb 4;17(3):100224. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2025.100224. eCollection 2025 May. J Hand Microsurg. 2025. PMID: 40170673 Review.
-
Machine learning prediction of postoperative unplanned 30-day hospital readmission in older adult.Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Aug 10;9:910688. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.910688. eCollection 2022. Front Mol Biosci. 2022. PMID: 36032677 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials