Voice-Related Quality of Life Increases With a Talking Tracheostomy Tube: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 31385620
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.28211
Voice-Related Quality of Life Increases With a Talking Tracheostomy Tube: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of our study was to determine the quality of life (QOL) using a talking tracheostomy tube.
Methods: Randomized clinical trial (NCT2018562). Adult intensive care unit patients who were mechanically ventilated, awake, alert, attempting to communicate, English-speaking, and could not tolerate one-way speaking valve were included. Intervention comprised a Blue Line Ultra Suctionaid (BLUSA) talking tracheostomy tube (Smiths Medical, Dublin, OH, US). Outcome measures included QOL scores measured using Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients (QOL-MV) and Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL), Speech Intelligibility Test (SIT) scores, independence, and satisfaction.
Results: The change in V-RQOL scores from pre- to postintervention was higher among patients using a BLUSA (Smiths Medical) compared to those who did not (P = 0.001). The QOL-MV scores from pre- to postintervention were significantly higher among patients who used a BLUSA (Smiths Medical) compared to patients who did not use BLUSA (Smiths Medical) or a one-way speaking valve (P = 0.04). SIT scores decreased by 6.4 points for each 1-point increase in their Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (P = 0.04). The overall QOL-MV scores correlated moderately with the overall V-RQOL scores (correlation coefficient = 0.59). Cronbach alpha score for overall QOL-MV was 0.71. Seventy-three percent of the 22 intervention patients reported the ability to use the BLUSA (Smiths Medical) with some level of independence, whereas 41% reported some level of satisfaction with the use of BLUSA (Smiths Medical). The lengths of stay was longer in the intervention group.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that BLUSA (Smiths Medical) talking tracheostomy tube improves patient-reported QOL in mechanically ventilated patients with a tracheostomy who cannot tolerate cuff deflation.
Level of evidence: I Laryngoscope, 130:1249-1255, 2020.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02018562.
Keywords: Voice; critically ill; mechanical ventilation; quality of life; tracheostomy.
© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
-
- Adam SI, Srinet P, Aronberg RM, Rosenberg G, Leder SB. Verbal communication with the Blom low profile and Passy-Muir one-way tracheotomy tube speaking valves. J Commun Disord 2015;56:40-46.
-
- Torke AM, Callahan CM, Sachs GA, et al. Communication quality predicts psychological well-being and satisfaction in family surrogates of hospitalized older adults: an observational study. J Gen Intern Med 2018;33:298-304.
-
- Patient Safety Systems Chapter, Sentinel Event Policy and RCA2. Available at: https://www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event.aspx. Accessed July 31, 2019.
-
- Morris LL, Bedon AM, McIntosh E, Whitmer A. Restoring speech to tracheostomy patients. Crit Care Nurse 2015;35:13-27; quiz 28.
-
- Pandian V, Thompson CB, Feller-Kopman DJ, Mirski MA. Development and validation of a quality-of-life questionnaire for mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Crit Care Med 2015;43:142-148.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
