Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May;5(2):129-138.
doi: 10.1093/nop/npx026. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Compliance with patient-reported outcome assessment in glioma patients: predictors for drop out

Mirjam Renovanz  1 , Marlene Hechtner  2 , Karoline Kohlmann  1 , Mareile Janko  1 , Minou Nadji-Ohl  3 , Susanne Singer  2 , Florian Ringel  1 , Jan Coburger  4 , Anne-Katrin Hickmann  3   5
Affiliations

Compliance with patient-reported outcome assessment in glioma patients: predictors for drop out

Mirjam Renovanz et al. Neurooncol Pract. 2018 May.

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes are of high importance in clinical neuro-oncology. However, assessment is still suboptimal. We aimed at exploring factors associated with the probability for a) drop out of study and b) death during follow-up.

Methods: Patients were assessed twice during follow-up visits scheduled within 3 to 5 months of each other by using 3 validated patient-reported outcome measures (t1: first assessment, t2: second assessment). As "death" was seen as a competing risk for drop out, univariate competing risk Cox regression models were applied to explore factors associated with dropping out (age, gender, WHO grade, living situation, recurrent surgery, Karnofsky Performance Status, time since diagnosis, and patient-reported outcomes assessed by Distress Thermometer, EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BN20, and SCNS-SF-34G).

Results: Two hundred forty-six patients were eligible, 173 (70%) participated. Patients declining participation were diagnosed with glioblastomas more often than with other gliomas (56% vs 39%). At t2, 32 (18%) patients dropped out, n = 14 death-related, n = 18 for other reasons. Motor dysfunction (EORTC-QLQ-BN20) was associated with higher risk for non-death-related drop out (HR: 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .03). Death-related drop out was associated with age (HR: 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14; P = .002), Karnofsky Performance Status (HR: 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96; P < .001), lower physical functioning (EORTC-QLQ-C30; HR: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; P = .04) and lower motor functioning (EORTC-QLQ-BN20; HR: 1.020; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; P = .02).

Conclusion: Patients with motor dysfunction and poorer clinical condition seem to be more likely to drop out of studies applying patient-reported outcome measures. This should be taken into account when planning studies assessing glioma patients and for interpretation of results of patient-reported outcome assessments in clinical routine.

Keywords: glioma; neuro-oncology; nonparticipation; study drop out; supportive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Robin AM, Kalkanis SN, Rock J et al. . Through the patient’s eyes: an emphasis on patient-centered values in operative decision making in the management of malignant glioma. J Neurooncol. 2014;119(3):473–479. - PubMed
    1. Rooney AG, Carson A, Grant R. Depression in cerebral glioma patients: a systematic review of observational studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(1):61–76. - PubMed
    1. Rooney AG, McNamara S, Mackinnon M et al. . The frequency, longitudinal course, clinical associations, and causes of emotional distress during primary treatment of cerebral glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(5):635–643. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ford E, Catt S, Chalmers A et al. . Systematic review of supportive care needs in patients with primary malignant brain tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14(4):392–404. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Janda M, Steginga S, Dunn J et al. . Unmet supportive care needs and interest in services among patients with a brain tumour and their carers. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71(2):251–258. - PubMed