Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 4:12:31-42.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.05.010. eCollection 2019 Jul.

The effect of an mHealth clinical decision-making support system on neonatal mortality in a low resource setting: A cluster-randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

The effect of an mHealth clinical decision-making support system on neonatal mortality in a low resource setting: A cluster-randomized controlled trial

Hannah Brown Amoakoh et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: MHealth interventions promise to bridge gaps in clinical care but documentation of their effectiveness is limited. We evaluated the utilization and effect of an mhealth clinical decision-making support intervention that aimed to improve neonatal mortality in Ghana by providing access to emergency neonatal protocols for frontline health workers.

Methods: In the Eastern Region of Ghana, sixteen districts were randomized into two study arms (8 intervention and 8 control clusters) in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Institutional neonatal mortality data were extracted from the District Health Information System-2 during an 18-month intervention period. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis and estimated the effect of the intervention on institutional neonatal mortality (primary outcome measure) using grouped binomial logistic regression with a random intercept per cluster. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02468310 ) and Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR20151200109073).

Findings: There were 65,831 institutional deliveries and 348 institutional neonatal deaths during the study period. Overall, 47 ∙ 3% of deliveries and 56 ∙ 9% of neonatal deaths occurred in the intervention arm. During the intervention period, neonatal deaths increased from 4 ∙ 5 to 6 ∙ 4 deaths and, from 3 ∙ 9 to 4 ∙ 3 deaths per 1000 deliveries in the intervention arm and control arm respectively. The odds of neonatal death was 2⋅09 (95% CI (1 ∙ 00;4 ∙ 38); p = 0 ∙ 051) times higher in the intervention arm compared to the control arm (adjusted odds ratio). The correlation between the number of protocol requests and the number of deliveries per intervention cluster was 0 ∙ 71 (p = 0 ∙ 05).

Interpretation: The higher risk of institutional neonatal death observed in intervention clusters may be due to problems with birth and death registration, unmeasured and unadjusted confounding, and unintended use of the intervention. The findings underpin the need for careful and rigorous evaluation of mHealth intervention implementation and effects.

Funding: Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research - WOTRO, Science for Global Development; Utrecht University.

Keywords: Ghana; Low and middle income countries; Neonatal mortality; mHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Clusters participating in randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of an mHealth clinical decision-making intervention on neonatal mortality in Ghana.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trial flow-chart of cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of an mHealth clinical decision making tool on neonatal mortality in Ghana.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Data sources and structure for cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of a clinical decision-making intervention in the Eastern Region of Ghana.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Institutional neonatal mortality per 1000 deliveries in intervention and control clusters one year before the start of the intervention and during the intervention period.

References

    1. Organization WH Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015. Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations population division. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/194254/1/9789241565141_eng.pdf?...
    1. Lawn J.E., Cousens S., Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365:891–900. - PubMed
    1. Liu L., Johnson H.L., Cousens S. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012;379:2151–2161. - PubMed
    1. Say L., Chou D., Gemmill A. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2014;2:e323–e333. - PubMed
    1. Lassi Z.S., Middleton P.F., Crowther C., Bhutta Z.A. Interventions to improve neonatal health and later survival: an overview of systematic reviews. EBioMedicine. 2015;2:985–1000. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data