Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;50(9):1073-1078.
doi: 10.1111/imj.14442.

Ambiguous medical abbreviation study: challenges and opportunities

Sarah Holper  1 , Rahul Barmanray  1   2   3 , Blake Colman  1 , Christopher J Yates  1   3 , Danny Liew  4 , David Smallwood  1   5
Affiliations

Ambiguous medical abbreviation study: challenges and opportunities

Sarah Holper et al. Intern Med J. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers often abbreviate for convenience, but ambiguous abbreviations may cause miscommunication, which jeopardises patient care. Robust large-scale research to quantify abbreviation frequency and ambiguity in medical documents is lacking.

Aims: To calculate the frequency of abbreviations used in discharge summaries, the proportion of these abbreviations that are ambiguous and the potential utility of auto-expansion software.

Methods: We designed a software programme to extract all instances of abbreviations from every General Medical Unit discharge summary from the Royal Melbourne Hospital in 2015. We manually expanded abbreviations using published inventories and clinical experience, logging multiple expansions for any abbreviation if identified. Abbreviations were classified based on well defined criteria as standardised and likely to be well understood, or ambiguous. Outcome measures included the range and frequency of standardised and ambiguous abbreviations, and the feasibility of electronic auto-expansion software based on these measures.

Results: Of the 1 551 537 words analysed from 2336 documents, 137 997 (8.9%) were abbreviations with 1741 distinct abbreviations identified. Most abbreviations (88.7%) had a single expansion. The most common abbreviation was PO (per os/orally), followed by BD (bis in die/twice daily) and 68.1% of abbreviations were standardised, largely pertaining to pathology/chemicals. This meant, however, that a large proportion (31.9%) of abbreviations (2.8% of all words) were ambiguous. The most common ambiguous abbreviation was Pt (patient/physiotherapy), followed by LFT (liver function test/lung function test).

Conclusions: Close to one-third of abbreviations used in general medical discharge summaries were ambiguous. Electronic auto-expansion of ambiguous abbreviations is likely to reduce miscommunication and improve patient safety.

Keywords: abbreviation; electronic health record; interprofessional relation; medical record; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Koh KC, Lau KM, Yusof SA, Mohamad AI, Shahabuddin FS, Ahmat NH et al. A study on the use of abbreviations among doctors and nurses in the medical department of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia 2015; 70: 334-40.
    1. Sinha S, Mcdermott F, Srinivas G, Houghton PWJ. Use of abbreviations by healthcare professionals: what is the way forward? Postgrad Med J 2011; 87: 450-2.
    1. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations. Sentinel Event Alert 23: Medication Errors Related to Potentially Dangerous Abbreviations. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission; 2001.
    1. Dooley MJ, Wiseman M, Gu G. Prevalence of error-prone abbreviations used in medication prescribing for hospitalised patients: multi-hospital evaluation. Intern Med J 2012; 42: e19-22.
    1. Chemali M, Hibbert EJ, Sheen A. General practitioner understanding of abbreviations used in hospital discharge letters. Med J Aust 2015; 203: 147.

LinkOut - more resources