Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Dec;10(6):1165-1174.
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12468. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

Sarcopenia and ovarian cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Sarcopenia and ovarian cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jorne Ubachs et al. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is the loss of skeletal muscle mass and function that occurs with advancing age and certain diseases. It is thought to have a negative impact on survival in cancer patients. Routine computed tomography imaging is often used to quantify skeletal muscle in cancer patients. Sarcopenia is defined by a low skeletal muscle index (SMI). Skeletal muscle radiation attenuation (SMRA) is used to define muscle quality. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to study the association between sarcopenia or SMRA and overall survival (OS) or complications in patients with ovarian cancer.

Methods: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and PEDro databases were searched from inception to 15 February 2019. Studies evaluating the prognostic effect of SMI and SMRA on ovarian cancer survival or surgical complications were included. Risk of bias and study quality were evaluated with the Quality in Prognosis Studies Instrument (QUIPS) according to the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

Results: The search strategy yielded 4262 hits in all four databases combined. Ten and eight studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis, respectively. Meta-analysis revealed a significant association between the SMI and OS [0.007; hazard ratio (HR): 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.20]. SMRA was also significantly associated with OS (P < 0.001; HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.20). Association between the SMI and surgical complications had borderline statistical significance (0.05; HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.00-1.52). The risk of bias assessed with QUIPS was high in all studies. The quality of the evidence was very low.

Conclusions: Whereas our meta-analysis indicated that a low SMI and low SMRA are associated with survival in ovarian cancer patients, the low quality of the source data precludes drawing definitive conclusions.

Keywords: Cachexia; Meta-analysis; Ovarian cancer; Sarcopenia; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram depicting the selection process for studies. BCM, body composition measurement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta‐analysis of univariate data: the effect of low skeletal muscle index on survival. CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; IV, inverse variance; SE, standard error.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Meta‐analysis of multivariate data: the effect of low skeletal muscle index on survival. CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; IV, inverse variance; SE, standard error.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Meta‐analysis of univariate data: the effect of low muscle attenuation on overall survival. CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; IV, inverse variance; SE, standard error; SMRA, skeletal muscle radiation attenuation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Meta‐analysis of multivariate data: the effect of low muscle attenuation on overall survival. CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; IV, inverse variance; SE, standard error; SMRA, skeletal muscle radiation attenuation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Meta‐analysis: effect of low skeletal muscle index on surgical complications. CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; IV, inverse variance; SE, standard error. Conrad et al. assessed core muscle index instead of skeletal muscle index.

Comment in

References

    1. Timmermans M, Sonke GS, Van de Vijver KK, van der Aa MA, Kruitwagen RFPM. No improvement in long‐term survival for epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a population‐based study between 1989 and 2014 in the Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 2018;88:31–37. - PubMed
    1. Tanyi JL, Bobisse S, Ophir E, Tuyaerts S, Roberti A, Genolet R, et al. Personalized cancer vaccine effectively mobilizes antitumor T cell immunity in ovarian cancer. Sci Transl Med 2018;10:eaao5931. - PubMed
    1. Genta S, Ghisoni E, Giannone G, Mittica G, Valabrega G. Reprogramming T‐cells for adoptive immunotherapy of ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2018;18:359–367. - PubMed
    1. Cornelison R, Llaneza DC, Landen CN. Emerging therapeutics to overcome chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian cancer: a mini‐review. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:2171. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sikorska K, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Schreuder HW, Hermans RH, et al. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;378:230–240. - PubMed