Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020;66(1):95-104.
doi: 10.1159/000500955. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

Life Expectancy: Frequently Used, but Hardly Understood

Affiliations
Review

Life Expectancy: Frequently Used, but Hardly Understood

Marc Luy et al. Gerontology. 2020.

Abstract

Period life expectancy is one of the most used summary indicators for the overall health of a population. Its levels and trends direct health policies, and researchers try to identify the determining risk factors to assess and forecast future developments. The use of period life expectancy is often based on the assumption that it directly reflects the mortality conditions of a certain year. Accordingly, the explanation for changes in life expectancy are typically sought in factors that have an immediate impact on current mortality conditions. It is frequently overlooked, however, that this indicator can also be affected by at least three kinds of effects, in particular in the situation of short-term fluctuations: cohort effects, heterogeneity effects, and tempo effects. We demonstrate their possible impact with the example of the almost Europe-wide decrease in life expectancy in 2015, which caused a series of reports about an upsurge of a health crisis, and we show that the consideration of these effects can lead to different conclusions. Therefore, we want to raise an awareness concerning the sensitivity of life expectancy to sudden changes and the menaces a misled interpretation of this indicator can cause.

Keywords: Cohort effects; Harvesting effect; Heterogeneity; Life expectancy; Tempo effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trends in period life expectancy (PLE, left y axes) and the total mortality rate (TMR, right y axes) in selected countries, women, 2009–2015. a Belgium. b France. c The Netherlands. d UK.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in period life expectancy (PLE), tempo-adjusted life expectancy (LE*), cross-sectional average length of life (CAL), and mean age at death (MAD) relative to 2009 in selected countries, women, 2009–2015. a Belgium. b France. c The Netherlands. d UK.

References

    1. Guillot M, Period versus cohort life expectancy . International Handbook of Adult Mortality. In: Rogers RG, Crimmins EM, editors. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer; 2011. pp. pp. 533–50.
    1. Eurostat: Life expectancy at birth by sex 2019 Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&... (data downloaded on February 4, 2019)
    1. Francia F, Pandolfi P, Odone A, Signorelli C. Excess mortality in Italy: should we care about low influenza vaccine uptake? Scand J Public Health. 2017;0:1–5. - PubMed
    1. Green MA, Dorling D, Minton J, Pickett KE. Could the rise in mortality rates since 2015 be explained by changes in the number of delayed discharges of NHS patients? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71((11)):1068–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hiam L, Dorling D, Harrison D, McKee M. What caused the spike in mortality in England and Wales in January 2015? J R Soc Med. 2017 Apr;110((4)):131–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types