Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;63(7):530-536.
doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_222_19.

Is COMBIPECS the answer to perioperative analgesia for breast surgery? A double blinded randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Is COMBIPECS the answer to perioperative analgesia for breast surgery? A double blinded randomized controlled trial

Rakhi Khemka et al. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aims: Pecs block and its variations provides perioperative analgesia, reduce PONV and other opioid related side effects. We hypothesized that COMIBPES block in addition to general anaesthesia will provide better postoperative analgesia when compared to general anaesthesia alone in breast cancer surgery patients.

Methods: After obtaining permission from the institutional review board and registering the trial with Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI), we conducted a double blinded randomized controlled trial of 100 patients posted for elective breast surgery with axillary dissection. Patients were divided into two groups, P (Pecs block) and C (control). Intraoperative analgesia, postoperative analgesia, postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) and shoulder mobility on first postoperative day (POD1) were noted. Primary outcomes were the pain scores measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and cumulative intravenous morphine consumption from patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pump at measurement intervals of 0, 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively.

Results: Intraoperatively, Group P patients did not require any additional analgesia, whereas all the patients in Group C required additional intraoperative morphine (mean, SD: 5.12, 2.63 mg, compared to nil in group P, P< 0.01). COMBIPECS block group had lower pain scores and PCA morphine requirements, less PONV and better shoulder mobility on POD1.

Conclusion: COMBIPECS block is a valuable addition to general anaesthesia for breast cancer surgery as it reduces pain and PONV while allowing better postoperative shoulder mobility.

Keywords: Breast surgery; chest wall; regional anesthesia; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ultrasound images of COMBIPECS block showing (a) Initial ultrasonogram, (b) Needle entry and rib strike, (c) LA injected at the intended planes while withdrawing
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT diagram
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Mean pain scores at studied intervals. X axis: time, Y axis: mean VAS score. (b) PCA morphine cumulative readings at measuring intervals. X axis: time, Y axis: cumulative morphine consumption (mg)

References

    1. Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: A critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011;12:725–46. - PubMed
    1. Cho JS, Lee MH, Kim SI, Park S, Park HS, Oh E, et al. The effects of perioperative anesthesia and analgesia on immune function in patients undergoing breast cancer resection: A prospective randomized study. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14:970–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Syal K, Chandel A. Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effect of paravertebral block, pectoral nerve block and local infiltration in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: A randomised double-blind trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:643–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanco R. The 'pecs block': A novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery. Anesthesia. 2011;66:847–8. - PubMed
    1. Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras MT. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): A novel approach to breast surgery. Rev EspAnestesiolReanim. 2012;59:470–5. - PubMed