Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;10(4):751-765.
doi: 10.21037/jgo.2019.03.10.

Frequency and prognostic significance of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic literature review

Affiliations

Frequency and prognostic significance of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic literature review

Audra N Boscoe et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The recognition of distinct molecular subgroups within cholangiocarcinoma (CC), along with the increasing availability of targeted therapies, suggests that further characterization of the prevalence and prognosis of frequently occurring subgroups may assist with the development of more effective treatment approaches for the management of CC. A systematic review was performed to investigate the prevalence of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations (mIDH1) in patients with CC, the possible clinical and prognostic significance of mIDH1, and the presence of co-mutations in tumors with mIDH1.

Methods: This review was conducted using the Cochrane dual-reviewer methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Searches were performed in Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Trials Register and Database of Systematic Reviews, and other Cochrane Library assets using terms for CC and mIDH1 with no language or date restrictions for articles published up to December 31, 2017. Searches were also performed of abstracts presented at the following conferences in 2016 and 2017: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), ASCO-Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium (ASCO-GI), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), and ESMO-Asia. Screening was performed separately by two reviewers and cross-checked. Any discrepancies between reviewers were resolved by a senior researcher. Data from all selected references were recorded in a data extraction grid.

Results: A total of 46 publications met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Of these publications, 45 reported the frequency of mIDH1 among a total sample of 5,393 patients with CC. mIDH1 was enriched in intrahepatic CC (ICC), with 552 (13.1%; 95% CI, 12.1-14.2) of the 4,214 patients with ICC having the mutation compared with 9 (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.4-1.5%) of the 1,123 patients with extrahepatic CC (ECC). The percentage of females with mIDH1 CC (66.2%; 95% CI, 57.7-73.7%) was higher than in the overall CC population (44.4%). The frequency of mIDH1 in patients with ICC reported in individual studies ranged from 4.5-55.6%, and a significantly higher frequency was reported in non-Asian centers compared with Asian centers (weighted mean, 16.5% vs. 8.8%; P<0.001). The prevalence of mIDH1 in patients with ICC at USA centers was 18.0% (95% CI, 16.4-19.8%). Eleven publications reported the prevalence of co-mutations in patients with mIDH1 ICC, with the most frequent being AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A) (22.0%), BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) (15.5%), and PBRM1 (13.3%). Eight publications investigated the possible prognostic significance of mIDH1. None of the studies reported a statistically significant association between mIDH1 and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or time to progression.

Conclusions: This systematic review substantiates the prevalence of mIDH1 in CC and further characterizes clinical, pathologic, and genetic covariates within this sub-population. Co-mutation data may inform future studies of mechanisms of response and resistance to mIDH1-targeted therapies.

Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma (CC); clinical prognosis; isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1); prevalence; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: AN Boscoe is an employee and shareholder of Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc. C Rolland is an employee of Envision Pharma Group, paid consultants to Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc in connection with this study. RK Kelley receives support (to institution) for conduct of clinical trials from: Agios, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, MedImmune, Merck, QED, Novartis, Taiho; she also receives consulting fees (to individual) for advisory board/IDMC membership from Genentech/Roche and Target Pharma Solutions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram for screening and selection of the literature search for CC and mutations in IDH1. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; CC, cholangiocarcinoma; IDH1, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1; mIDH1, IDH1 mutation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency of mIDH1 according to tumor location. Dots represent individual studies where mIDH1 was assessed in each anatomic location. Black lines indicate median with interquartile range. mIDH1, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation; ECC, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of patients with specific isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (across 20 studies and 244 patients).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative co-mutations investigated in ≥30 patients with ICC having mIDH1. Only genes analyzed in ≥30 patients with ICC are presented. Values in pink boxes are the proportion of patients with mutations; lighter shading indicates lower proportions. ARID1A, AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A ; BAP1, BRCA1-associated protein 1; BRAF, B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase; CDKN2A, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A; CTNNB1, catenin beta 1; GNAS, GNAS complex locus; IDH2, isocitrate dehydrogenase 2; KRAS, KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase; MAP2K1, mitogen-activated protein kinase 1; NRAS, NRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase; PBRM1, polybromo 1; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; SMAD4, SMAD family member 4; TP53, tumor protein 53; ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; mIDH1, IDH1 mutations.

References

    1. Rizvi S, Khan SA, Hallemeier CL, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma - evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018;15:95-111. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.157 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shiao MS, Chiablaem K, Charoensawan V, et al. Emergence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: how high-throughput technologies expedite the solutions for a rare cancer type. Front Genet 2018;9:309. 10.3389/fgene.2018.00309 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan SA, Emadossadaty S, Ladep NG, et al. Rising trends in cholangiocarcinoma: is the ICD classification system misleading us? J Hepatol 2012;56:848-54. 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.11.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elfaki DH, Gossard AA, Lindor KD. Cholangiocarcinoma: expanding the spectrum of risk factors. J Gastrointest Cancer 2008;39:114-7. 10.1007/s12029-008-9040-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petrick JL, Thistle JE, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, et al. Body mass index, diabetes and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma risk: The liver cancer pooling project and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:1494-505. 10.1038/s41395-018-0207-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed