Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;182(5):1269-1276.
doi: 10.1111/bjd.18420. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel

Affiliations

Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel

M Schaller et al. Br J Dermatol. 2020 May.

Abstract

Background: A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and align with guidance from other working groups.

Objectives: To update and extend previous global ROSCO recommendations in line with the latest research and continue supporting uptake of the phenotype approach in rosacea through clinical tool development.

Methods: Nineteen dermatologists and two ophthalmologists used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements pertaining to critical aspects of rosacea diagnosis, classification and management. Voting was electronic and blinded.

Results: Delphi statements on which the panel achieved consensus of ≥ 75% voting 'Agree' or 'Strongly agree' are presented. The panel recommends discussing disease burden with patients during consultations, using four questions to assist conversations. The primary treatment objective should be achievement of complete clearance, owing to previously established clinical benefits for patients. Cutaneous and ocular features are defined. Treatments have been reassessed in line with recent evidence and the prior treatment algorithm updated. Combination therapy is recommended to benefit patients with multiple features. Ongoing monitoring and dialogue should take place between physician and patients, covering defined factors to maximize outcomes. A prototype clinical tool (Rosacea Tracker) and patient case studies have been developed from consensus statements.

Conclusions: The current survey updates previous recommendations as a basis for local guideline development and provides clinical tools to facilitate a phenotype approach in practice and improve rosacea patient management. What's already known about this topic? A transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea is underway and is being recommended by multiple working groups. New research has become available since the previous ROSCO consensus, necessitating an update and extension of recommendations. What does this study add? We offer updated global recommendations for clinical practice that account for recent research, to continue supporting the transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea. We present prototype clinical tools to facilitate use of the phenotype approach in practice and improve management of patients with rosacea.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) modified Delphi process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Usage and reception of the phenotype approach in rosacea. (a) The extent to which ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel members report using a phenotype approach for rosacea diagnosis and classification before and after the ROSCO 2017 recommendations (n = 20). (b) The extent to which ROSCO panel members report using a phenotype approach for rosacea management and treatment before and after the ROSCO 2017 recommendations (n = 20). (c) Response of ROSCO panellists’ colleagues to the phenotype approach in rosacea in daily practice and at scientific meetings (n = 21).

Comment in

References

    1. Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M et al Standard classification of rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the Classification and Staging of Rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46:584–7. - PubMed
    1. van Zuuren EJ, Graber MA, Hollis S et al Interventions for rosacea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; CD003262. - PubMed
    1. van Zuuren EJ, Graber MA, Hollis S et al Interventions for rosacea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; CD003262. - PubMed
    1. van Zuuren EJ, Kramer S, Carter B et al Interventions for rosacea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD003262. - PubMed
    1. van Zuuren EJ, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B et al Interventions for rosacea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; CD003262. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding