DNA damage effects of inhalation anesthetics in human bronchoalveolar cells
- PMID: 31393354
- PMCID: PMC6708896
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016518
DNA damage effects of inhalation anesthetics in human bronchoalveolar cells
Abstract
Background: The main objective was to evaluate and compare the local genotoxicity of sevoflurane and desflurane in bronchoalveolar cells, while the secondary outcome was to detect systemic oxidative DNA damage. To our knowledge, our study is the first one to evaluate the local effects of inhalation anesthetics in human bronchoalveolar cells in patients.
Methods: American Society of Anesthesiologists group I-II patients scheduled for lumbar discectomy surgery were enrolled in this randomized prospective study. Patients were randomized to sevoflurane or desflurane for anesthesia maintenance. Bronchoalveolar lavage samples and peripheral blood samples were taken at 2-time points: the first point (baseline, T1); and the second point (postexposure, T2). Final number of 48 samples were the sevoflurane (n = 22) and desflurane (n = 26) groups. Comet assay was applied to examine genotoxic properties. Oxidative DNA damage in plasma was measured with 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG).
Results: T2 values were higher than baseline values in both the desflurane group (tail-length: 66 ± 24, %DNA in tail: 72 ± 60, tail moment: 47.52 ± 14.4; P = .001, P = .005, P = .001, respectively) and the sevoflurane group (tail-length: 58 ± 33, %DNA in tail: 88 ± 80, tail moment: 51.04 ± 26.4; P = .001, P = .012, P = .001, respectively). T2 plasma 8-OHdG levels were also higher than baseline levels in the desflurane group (3.91 ± 0.19 ng/ml vs 1.32 ± 0.20 ng/ml, P = .001) and sevoflurane group (3.98 ± 0.18 ng/ml vs 1.31 ± 0.11 ng/ml, P = .001). There were no differences between the 2 groups in comet parameters and 8-OHdG levels.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that both inhalation agents cause DNA damage in the bronchoalveolar cells. Also, we detected increases in plasma 8-OHdG concentrations. Local genotoxicity and systemic oxidized DNA damage were similar in both groups.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Nofer TW, Nofer JR, Jajte J, et al. Oxidation damage to DNA and oxidative stress in subjects occupationally exposed to nitrous oxide (N2O). Mutat Res 2012;731:58–63. - PubMed
-
- Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol 2004;26:249–61. - PubMed
-
- Collins AR. The comet assay: a heavenly method. Mutagenesis 2014;30:1–4. - PubMed
-
- Speit G, Kojima H, Burlinson B, et al. Critical issues with the in vivo comet assay: a report of the comet assay working group in the 6th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT). Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2015;783:6–12. - PubMed
-
- Bajpayee M, Kumar A, Dhawan A. The comet assay: assessment of in vitro and in vivo DNA damage. Methods Mol Biol 2013;1044:325–45. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
