Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0219568.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219568. eCollection 2019.

Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway

Affiliations

Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway

C Vossius et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Day care services aim to offer meaningful activities and a safe environment for the attendees and a respite for family caregivers while being cost effective. This study compares the use of formal and informal care in users and non-users of day care centres designed for persons with dementia.

Method: Users of day care designed for dementia (DC group) and non-users (NDC group) were followed over a period of 24 months or until nursing home admission (NHA) respectively death. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline and after 12 and 24 months. The use of care was recorded by Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD).

Results: A total of 257 persons with dementia participated in the study, 181 in the DC group and 76 in the NDC group. Users of day care centres cause higher costs due to the expenses for day care, while neither the use of home nursing, secondary care, informal care nor the time until NHA did show any differences between users and non-users. The overall costs were higher in the DC group at baseline and after 12 months, but this difference was no longer present at the end of the two-year study period.

Conclusion: Our results indicate no potential cost-saving effect of day care designed for people with dementia, as the use of day care did neither result in a reduced use of care nor in a delay of NHA. Future research should balance the non-monetary benefits of day care against its costs for a full cost-effectiveness analysis, most favourable in a RCT-design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Time trends for the DC group and NDC group at BL, FU1 and FU2.
A: Cost for primary care; B: Odds for secondary care; C: Cost for formal care; D: Costs for informal care; E: Total costs. BL = baseline; FU1 = follow-up1 at 12 months; FU2 = follow-up2 at 24 months; DC = users of day care centres designed for dementia; NDC = non-users of day care centres designed for dementia.

References

    1. Gaugler JE, Zarit SH. The effectiveness of adult day services for disabled older people. J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;12:23–47. - PubMed
    1. Abramson CM. Who are the clients? Goal displacement in an adult day care center for elders with dementia. International journal of aging & human development. 2009;68:65–92. - PubMed
    1. Fields NL, Anderson KA, Dabelko-Schoeny H. The effectiveness of adult day services for older adults: a review of the literature from 2000 to 2011. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2014;33:130–63. 10.1177/0733464812443308 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tretteteig S, Vatne S, Rokstad AM. The influence of day care centres for people with dementia on family caregivers: an integrative review of the literature. Aging Ment Health. 2016;20:450–62. 10.1080/13607863.2015.1023765 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mavall L, Malmberg B. Day care for persons with dementia: An alternative for whom? Dementia. 2007;6:27–43.

Publication types