Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov-Dec;19(8):956-962.
doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

The Use and Impact of Professional Interpretation in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Affiliations

The Use and Impact of Professional Interpretation in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Emily A Hartford et al. Acad Pediatr. 2019 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background and objective: Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience worse health care outcomes compared to English proficient (EP) patients, and professional interpretation is underutilized in clinical settings. The objectives of this study were to describe patterns of interpreter use in a pediatric emergency department (ED), to determine factors associated with its use, and to examine differences in outcomes between EP families and those with LEP.

Methods: ED encounters for LEP and EP patients were reviewed in a retrospective cohort study design over a 15 month period. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare patient encounters and factors associated with interpreter use.

Results: Interpreter use for families who preferred a non-English language was 45.4%. Use of interpretation was less likely during busier times of day (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.93), with a lower triage acuity (OR 0.66, CI 0.62-0.70), and with each increasing year of patient age (OR 0.97, CI 0.96-0.98). LEP patients who did not receive interpretation were less likely to be admitted than EP patients (OR 0.69, 0.62-0.78). Patients of LEP families, with or without interpretation, were more likely to be transferred to the ICU within 24 hours of admission than patients of EP families (OR 1.76, 1.07-2.90; 1.85, 1.08-3.18) suggesting that an aspect of clinical severity may have been missed in the ED.

Conclusions: Professional interpretation is currently underutilized in this ED for patients with LEP, and important differences in outcomes exist between LEP and EP patients. Factors associated with interpreter use will inform ongoing improvement efforts.

Keywords: emergency department; health equity; interpreter use; pediatrics; quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
Interpreter use by language.

References

    1. U.S. Census Bureau 2016. American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. Language Spoken at Home. American Fact Finder. https://factfinder.census.gov Published 2016 Accessed April 2, 2018.
    1. Eneriz-Wiemer M, Sanders LM, Barr DA, et al. Parental limited English proficiency and health outcomes for children with special health care needs: a systematic review. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14:128–136. 10.1016/j.acap.2013.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanders LM, Thompson VT, Wilkinson JD. Caregiver health literacy and the use of child health services. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e86–e92. 10.1542/peds.2005-1738. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hampers LC, Mcnulty JE. Professional interpreters and bilingual physicians in a pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1108 10.1001/archpedi.156.11.1108. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rogers AJ. The effect of limited English proficiency on admission rates from a pediatric emergency department: stratification by acuity. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:435 10.1197/aemj.10.5.435. - DOI - PubMed