Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov;56(11):1159-1167.
doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01397-4. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

Guidelines for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in Italy from 2010 to 2019: critical issues and the potential for improvement

Ester Vitacolonna  1   2   3 , Elena Succurro  4   5   6 , Annunziata Lapolla  4   5   7 , Marina Scavini  4   5   8 , Matteo Bonomo  4   5   9 , Graziano Di Cianni  4   5   10 , Antonino Di Benedetto  4   5   11 , Angela Napoli  4   5   12 , Andrea Tumminia  4   5   13 , Camilla Festa  4   5   12 , Cristina Lencioni  4   5   14 , Elisabetta Torlone  4   5   15 , Giorgio Sesti  6   16 , Domenico Mannino  4   5   17   18 , Francesco Purrello  13   19
Affiliations
Review

Guidelines for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in Italy from 2010 to 2019: critical issues and the potential for improvement

Ester Vitacolonna et al. Acta Diabetol. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Aims: In 2010, Italian health professionals rapidly implemented the one-step screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) based on a 75 g OGTT, to comply with the diagnostic criteria proposed by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG). The change was promoted by the two main Italian scientific societies of diabetology, Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD) and Società Italiana di Diabetologia (SID), and it took just a few months for the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, together with several scientific societies, to revise the criteria and include them in the National Guidelines System. Over the last 9 years, the implementation of these guidelines has shown some benefits and some drawbacks.

Methods: In order to evaluate the critical issues arisen from the implementation of the current Italian guidelines for the diagnosis of GDM, the studies published on this topic have been reviewed. The search was performed using the following keywords: "gestational diabetes" AND "diagnostic criteria" OR screening AND Ital*. The study is an expert opinion paper, based on the relevant scientific literature published between 2010 and 2019. The databases screened for the literature review included PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus.

Results: The implementation of the Guidelines for Screening and Diagnosis of GDM in Italy present some strengths and some weaknesses. One of the positive aspects is that high-risk women are required to perform an OGTT early in pregnancy. By contrast, there are several aspects in need of improvement: (1) In spite of the current indications, only a minority of high-risk women perform OGTT early in pregnancy; (2) several low-risk women are screened for GDM; (3) in some low-risk women affected by GDM, the diagnosis might be missed with the application of the current guidelines; (4) there is a lack of homogeneity in the risk assessment data from different regions.

Conclusions: In order to improve the current Italian GDM guidelines, some practical solutions have been suggested.

Keywords: Diagnostic criteria; Fetal outcomes; Gestational diabetes; Macrosomia; Maternal outcomes; Non-communicable diseases; Obesity prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources