Risks and benefits of everolimus
- PMID: 31397931
- DOI: 10.1111/tri.13489
Risks and benefits of everolimus
Comment on
-
Prospective randomized study comparing everolimus and mycophenolate sodium in de novo kidney transplant recipients from expanded criteria deceased donor.Transpl Int. 2019 Nov;32(11):1127-1143. doi: 10.1111/tri.13478. Epub 2019 Aug 27. Transpl Int. 2019. PMID: 31278785 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Ferreira AN, Rosso Felipe C, Marina Cristelli M, et al. Prospective randomized study comparing everolimus and mycophenolate sodium in de novo kidney transplant recipients from expanded criteria deceased donor. Transpl Int 2019; 32: 1127.
-
- Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, et al. The third international consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation 2018; 102: 900.
-
- Tedesco-Silva H, Felipe C, Ferreira A, et al. Reduced incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus and reduced tacrolimus doses. Am J Transplant 2015; 15: 2655.
-
- Vítko S, Margreiter R, Weimar W, et al. Three-year efficacy and safety results from a study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2521.
-
- Berger SP, Sommerer C, Witzke O, et al. Two-year outcomes in de novo renal transplant recipients receiving everolimus-facilitated calcineurin inhibitor reduction regimen from TRANSFORM study. Am J Transplant 2019. [Epub ahead of print] https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15480
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
