Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Aug;20(8):707-713.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001944.

Gastric Residual Volume Measurement in U.K. PICUs: A Survey of Practice

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Gastric Residual Volume Measurement in U.K. PICUs: A Survey of Practice

Lyvonne N Tume et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: Despite little evidence, the practice of routine measurement of gastric residual volume to guide both the initiation and delivery of enteral feeding in PICUs is widespread internationally. In light of increased scrutiny of the evidence surrounding this practice, and as part of a trial feasibility study, we aimed to determine enteral feeding and gastric residual volume measurement practices in U.K. PICUs.

Design: An online survey to 27 U.K. PICUs.

Setting: U.K. PICUs.

Subjects: A clinical nurse, senior doctor, and dietician were invited to collaboratively complete one survey per PICU and send a copy of their unit guidelines on enteral feeding and gastric residual volume.

Interventions: None.

Measurement and main results: Twenty-four of 27 units (89%) approached completed the survey. Twenty-three units (95.8%; 23/24) had written feeding guidelines, and 19 units (19/23; 83%) sent their guidelines for review. More units fed continuously (15/24; 62%) than intermittently (9/24; 37%) via the gastric route as their primary feeding method. All but one PICU routinely measured gastric residual volume, regardless of the method of feeding. Eighteen units had an agreed definition of feed tolerance, and all these included gastric residual volume. Gastric residual volume thresholds for feed tolerance were either volume based (mL/kg body weight) (11/21; 52%) or a percentage of the volume of feed administered (6/21; 29%). Yet only a third of units provided guidance about the technique of gastric residual volume measurement.

Conclusions: Routine gastric residual volume measurement is part of standard practice in U.K. PICUs, with little guidance provided about the technique which may impact the accuracy of gastric residual volume. All PICUs that defined feed tolerance included gastric residual volume in the definition. This is important to know when proposing a standard practice arm of any future trial of no-routine gastric residual volume measurement in critically ill children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Copyright form disclosure: Drs. Tume, Arch, Latten, Deja, Roper, Eccleson, Hickey, Brown, and Gale’s institutions received funding from National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme. Drs. Tume, Arch, Latten, Roper, Pathan, Eccleson, Hickey, and Brown received support for article research from NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme. Dr. Hickey’s institution received funding from NIHR Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme (EME Ref: 15/20/01), and she received funding from University of Liverpool (personal fees relating to the production of a Clinical Study Report for University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust). Ms. Brown’s institution received funding from the NIHR Doctoral Fellowship Programme. Dr. Gale’s institution received funding from Medical Research Council, Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR), and Department of Health (England); he has received support from Chiesi Pharmaceuticals to attend an educational conference; in the past 5 years he been investigator on received research grants from Medical Research Council, NIHR, CIHR, Department of Health in England, Mason Medical Research Foundation, Westminster Medical School Research Trust and Chiesi Pharmaceuticals; and he received support for article research from Research Councils UK (RCUK). Dr. Valla received funding from Baxter, Fresenius Kabi, and Nutricia. Dr. Dorling’s institution received funding from National Institute for Health Research and Nutrinia in 2017 and 2018 for part of his salary to work as an expert advisor on a trial of enteral insulin; he disclosed he was a member of the NIHR HTA General Board (from 2017 to 2018) and the NIHR HTA Maternity, Newborn and Child Health Panel (from 2013 to 2018); and he received support for article research from NIHR. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest."

Comment in

References

    1. Tume LN, Bickerstaff A, Latten L, et al. Routine gastric residual volume measurement and energy target achievement in the PICU: a comparison study. Eur J Peds. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-3015-8. Epub. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tume LN, Valla FV. A review of feeding intolerance in critically ill children. Eur J Peds. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3229-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tume LN, Latten L, Kenworthy L. Paediatric intensive care nurses’ decision-making around gastric residual volume measurement. Nurs in Crit Care. 2017 doi: 10.1111/nicc.12304. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tume LN, Balmaks R, da Cruz E, et al. European Practices in enteral feeding in infants with congenital heart disease: an ESPNIC survey. Ped Crit Care Med. 2017 doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001412. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Valla F, Gaillard-Le Roux B, Ford-Chessel C, et al. NutriRea-Ped 2014: the Nursing Survey on Nutrition Practices in French-speaking Pediatric Intensive Care Units. Ped Crit Care Med. 2015 doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000930. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types