Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Aug 9;23(1):278.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2511-9.

Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review

Nedra S Whitehead  1 , Laurina O Williams  2 , Sreelatha Meleth  1 , Sara M Kennedy  1 , Nneka Ubaka-Blackmoore  1 , Sharon M Geaghan  3 , James H Nichols  4 , Patrick Carroll  5 , Michael T McEvoy  6 , Julie Gayken  7 , Dennis J Ernst  8 , Christine Litwin  9 , Paul Epner  10 , Jennifer Taylor  1 , Mark L Graber  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review

Nedra S Whitehead et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: As many as 90% of patients develop anemia by their third day in an intensive care unit (ICU). We evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce phlebotomy-related blood loss on the volume of blood lost, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, and incidence of anemia.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) systematic review methods for rating study quality and assessing the body of evidence. Searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsychINFO, and CINAHL identified 2564 published references. We included studies of the impact of interventions to reduce phlebotomy-related blood loss on blood loss, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, or anemia among hospital inpatients. We excluded studies not published in English and studies that did not have a comparison group, did not report an outcome of interest, or were rated as poor quality. Twenty-one studies met these criteria. We conducted a meta-analysis if > 2 homogenous studies reported sufficient information for analysis.

Results: We found moderate, consistent evidence that devices that return blood from flushing venous or arterial lines to the patient reduced blood loss by approximately 25% in both neonatal ICU (NICU) and adult ICU patients [pooled estimate in adults, 24.7 (95% CI = 12.1-37.3)]. Bundled interventions that included blood conservation devices appeared to reduce blood loss by at least 25% (suggestive evidence). The evidence was insufficient to determine if these devices reduced hemoglobin decline or risk of anemia. The evidence suggested that small volume tubes reduced the risk of anemia, but was insufficient to determine if they affected the volume of blood loss or the rate of hemoglobin decline.

Conclusions: Moderate, consistent evidence indicated that devices that return blood from testing or flushing lines to the patient reduce the volume of blood loss by approximately 25% among ICU patients. The results of this systematic review support the use of blood conservation systems with arterial or venous catheters to eliminate blood waste when drawing blood for testing. The evidence was insufficient to conclude the devices impacted hemoglobin levels or transfusion rates. The use of small volume tubes may reduce the risk of anemia.

Keywords: Anemia; Blood conservation strategy; Clinical laboratory techniques; Iatrogenic diseases; Phlebotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No authors, other than from RTI International, received funding for the study. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Analytic framework for Laboratory Medicine Best Practice systematic review of interventions to reduce or prevent the incidence of iatrogenic anemia
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Literature search results
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The impact of closed blood sampling devices
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Silver MJ, Li YH, Gragg LA, Jubran F, Stoller JK. Reduction of blood loss from diagnostic sampling in critically ill patients using a blood-conserving arterial line system. Chest. 1993;104:1711–1715. - PubMed
    1. Nguyen BV, Bota DP, Melot C, Vincent JL. Time course of hemoglobin concentrations in nonbleeding intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:406–410. - PubMed
    1. Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Montgomery AA. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(582):e12–e21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, Fink MP, Levy MM, Abraham E, MacIntyre NR, Shabot MM, Duh MS, Shapiro MJ. The CRIT study: anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill--current clinical practice in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(1):39–52. - PubMed
    1. Sanchez-Giron F, Alvarez-Mora F. Reduction of blood loss from laboratory testing in hospitalized adult patients using small-volume (pediatric) tubes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:1916–1919. - PubMed

MeSH terms