Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 8;9(8):e027206.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027206.

Implementation strategies for interventions to improve the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by primary care clinicians: protocol for a systematic review

Affiliations

Implementation strategies for interventions to improve the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by primary care clinicians: protocol for a systematic review

Celia C Kamath et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: There is a considerable implementation gap in managing early stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care despite the high prevalence and risk for increased morbidity and mortality associated with CKD. This systematic review aims to synthesise the evidence of efficacy of implementation interventions aimed at primary care practitioners (PCPs) to improve CKD identification and management. We further aim to describe the interventions' behavioural change components.

Methods and analysis: We will conduct a systematic review of studies from 2000 to October 2017 that evaluate implementation interventions targeting PCPs and which include at least one clinically meaningful CKD outcome. We will search several electronic data bases and conduct reference mining of related systematic reviews and publications. An interdisciplinary team will independently and in duplicate, screen publications, extract data and assess the risk of bias. Clinical outcomes will include all clinically meaningful medical management outcomes relevant to CKD management in primary care such as blood pressure, chronic heart disease and diabetes target achievements. Quantitative evidence synthesis will be performed, where possible. Planned subgroup analyses include by (1) study design, (2) length of follow-up, (3) type of intervention, (4) type of implementation strategy, (5) whether a behavioural or implementation theory was used to guide study, (6) baseline CKD severity, (7) patient minority status, (8) study location and (9) academic setting or not.

Ethics and dissemination: Approval by research ethics board is not required since the review will only include published and publicly accessible data. Review findings will inform a future trial of an intervention to promote uptake of CKD diagnosis and treatment guidelines in our primary care setting and the development of complementary tools to support its successful adoption and implementation. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and develop accessible summaries of the results.

Prospero registration number: CRD42018102441.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease; guideline implementation; implementation strategies; primary care practitioner interventions; systematic review protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen AS, Forman JP, Orav EJ, et al. . Primary care management of chronic kidney disease. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26:386–92. 10.1007/s11606-010-1523-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins AJ, Foley RN, Chavers B, et al. . Us renal data system 2013 annual data report. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;63(1 Suppl). 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.11.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al. . Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 2007;298:2038–47. 10.1001/jama.298.17.2038 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, et al. . Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet 2013;382:260–72. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60687-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003;362:1225–30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1 - DOI - PubMed