Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Sep;94(9):1695-1706.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

Effect of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation on Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation on Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Xiaocheng Cheng et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension by conducting a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Methods: The Medline, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for clinical studies between January 1, 2009, and July 16, 2018. Studies that evaluated the effect of RDN on uncontrolled hypertension were identified. The primary endpoints were changes in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (BP) and office systolic BP. The secondary endpoints included changes in 24-hour ambulatory diastolic BP, office diastolic BP, and major adverse events.

Results: After a literature search and detailed evaluation, 12 randomized controlled trials with a total of 1539 individuals were included in the quantitative analysis. Pooled analyses indicated that RDN was associated with a significantly greater reduction of 24-hour systolic BP (mean difference [MD], -4.02 mm Hg; 95% CI, -5.49 to -2.56; P<.001) and office systolic BP (MD, -8.93 mm Hg; 95% CI, -14.03 to -3.83; P<.001) than controls. Similarly, RDN significantly reduced 24-hour diastolic BP (MD, -2.05 mm Hg; 95% CI, -3.05 to -1.05; P<.001) and office diastolic BP (MD, -4.49 mm Hg; 95% CI, -6.46 to -2.52; P<.001). RDN was not associated with an increased risk of major adverse events (relative risk, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.57; P=.76).

Conclusions: Catheter-based RDN was associated with a significant BP-lowering benefit without increasing major adverse events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Revisiting Renal Denervation.
    Townsend RR. Townsend RR. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Sep;94(9):1665-1667. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Aug 8. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019. PMID: 31402055 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by