Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;33(9):e22994.
doi: 10.1002/jcla.22994. Epub 2019 Aug 11.

Detection of non-criteria autoantibodies in women without apparent causes for pregnancy loss

Affiliations

Detection of non-criteria autoantibodies in women without apparent causes for pregnancy loss

Hongyuan Zhu et al. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Some of the non-criteria autoantibodies, especially non-conventional antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, were present with high prevalence in sporadic miscarriages and recurrent pregnant loss. However, whether these autoantibodies are associated with miscarriage patients without apparent causes remain unclear.

Methods: The subjects were recruited from the female patients visiting the Infertility Center at the Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from January 2017 to March 2018. The women who experienced one sporadic miscarriage (n = 89) or recurrent pregnancy loss (n = 125) were enrolled. The control participants (n = 59) were those women with normal pregnancy history and with no miscarriage or thrombosis experience. The collected serum specimens from above patients and controls were subjected to the 13 non-criteria autoantibody examinations, targeting non-conventional phospholipids, thyroid, sperm, endometrial, and anti-nuclear antigens.

Results: When compared with the controls, the following non-criteria antibodies stood out in present study with significantly increased frequency and were listed in the order of decreasing positive rates: aPE IgM (40.0%), ANA (15.2%), aEM IgG (13.6%), aPE IgG (12.8%), and aPT IgM (10.4%). Except for ANA, the presence of aPE IgM, aEM IgG, aPE IgG, and aPT IgM was not associated with positivity of LA tests. In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the combined aPE IgG and aEM IgG biomarker panel had the best discriminating power between miscarriage patients and healthy controls.

Conclusion: Our findings suggested that the non-criteria could be included as part of the pregnancy loss evaluation when apparent causes are absent, and the conventional aPLs tests failed to provide interpretations.

Keywords: APS; antiphospholipid; autoantibody; miscarriage; pregnancy loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram for patient recruitment and study design
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic analyses of autoantibodies in differentiating patients with or without pregnancy loss (A) and differentiating patients with one sporadic miscarriage or recurrent pregnancy loss (B)

References

    1. Ford HB, Schust DJ. Recurrent pregnancy loss: etiology, diagnosis, and therapy. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2(2):76‐83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1103‐1111. - PubMed
    1. Garrido‐Gimenez C, Alijotas‐Reig J. Recurrent miscarriage: causes, evaluation and management. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1073):151‐162. - PubMed
    1. Saravelos SH, Regan L. Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014;41(1):157‐166. - PubMed
    1. Porter TF, Scott JR. Alloimmune causes of recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):393‐400. - PubMed