Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;3(1):12-17.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.373.

Measuring institutional community engagement: Adding value to academic health systems

Syed M Ahmed  1 , Sharon Neu Young  1 , Mia C DeFino  2 , Joseph E Kerschner  3
Affiliations

Measuring institutional community engagement: Adding value to academic health systems

Syed M Ahmed et al. J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Beyond medical schools' historical focus on pillar missions including clinical care, education, and research, several medical schools now include community engagement (CE) as a mission. However, most academic health systems (AHSs) lack the tools to provide metrics, evaluation, and standardization for quantifying progress and contributions of the CE mission. Several nationwide initiatives, such as that driven by the Institute of Medicine recommending advances in CE metrics at institutions receiving Clinical and Translational Science Awards, have encouraged the research and development of systematic metrics for CE, but more progress is needed. The CE components practical model provides a foundation for analyzing and evaluating different types of CE activities at AHSs through five components: research, education, community outreach and community service, policy and advocacy, and clinical care. At the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), an annual survey administered to faculty and staff assessed the types and number of CE activities from the prior year. Survey results were combined to create a CE report for departments across the institution and inform MCW leadership. Insights gathered from the survey have contributed to next steps in CE tracking and evaluation, including the development of a CE dashboard to track CE activities in real time. The dashboard provides resources for how individuals can advance the CE mission through their work and guide CE at the institutional level.

Keywords: Community engagement; academic health systems; community engagement dashboard; community-engaged research; measuring institutional community engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The community engagement components practical model [11].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ahmed SM, Palermo AG. Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. American Journal of Public Health 2010; 100(8): 1380–1387. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCloskey DJ, et al. Principles of Community Engagement. 2nd ed NIH Publication No. 11–7782; Washington DC, USA: Department of Health and Human Services, 2011.
    1. Goldstein AO, Bearman RS. Community engagement in US and Canadian medical schools. Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2011; 2: 43–49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michener L, et al. Aligning the goals of community-engaged research: why and how academic health centers can successfully engage with communities to improve health. Academic Medicine 2012; 87(3): 285–291. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health 2010; 100(Suppl 1): S40–S46. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources