Externally Validated Score to Predict Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction With Cervi Ripening
- PMID: 31403585
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003405
Externally Validated Score to Predict Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction With Cervi Ripening
Abstract
Objective: To build a score to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction with cervical ripening, and to compare its predictive capacities with other already existing scores.
Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of data collected in the prospective multicenter observational French population-based cohort study Methods of Induction of Labor and Perinatal Outcomes, the primary objective of which was to obtain national data regarding labor induction practices in 94 maternity units. A total of 1,692 patients were randomly split into a derivation data set of 1,024 patients (60%) and an internal validation set of 668 patients (40%). Statistical analyses were performed using a Bayesian approach, allowing the use of priors (ie, previous results published in the literature). The final score is a simplified 50-point score. The score was validated using the internal validation set and an external data set of 4,242 patients from the National Institutes of Health's Consortium for Safe Labor database. We compared the area under the curve (AUC) of our score with two other scores: the modified Bishop score and the Levine score, which is a recently published risk calculator for cesarean delivery after labor induction with unfavorable cervix.
Results: In the multivariate analysis, height, body mass index, gestational age, parity, dilation, effacement, fetal head station, medical indication, suspicion of macrosomia, premature rupture of membranes and concerning fetal status were found to be strongly associated with cesarean delivery. The AUC in the derivation set and internal validation set were 0.76 (0.73-0.79) and 0.74 (0.70-0.78), respectively. On the external validation set, the AUC for the present score, the Levine score, and the modified Bishop score were 0.81 (0.79-0.82), 0.76 (0.75-0.78), and 0.74 (0.73-0.76), respectively.
Conclusion: Our easy-to-use, externally validated score is efficient in predicting cesarean delivery after labor induction with cervical ripening.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02477085.
Comment in
-
Externally Validated Score to Predict Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction With Cervical Ripening.Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):1363. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003593. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31764752 No abstract available.
-
In Reply.Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):1363-1364. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003594. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31764753 No abstract available.
References
-
- INSERM, DREES. Enquête nationale périnatale: rapport 2016. Available at: http://www.epopé-inserm.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ENP2016_rapport_co.... Retrieved April 25, 2018.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db155.htm. Retrieved June 24, 2018.
-
- EURO-PERISTAT Project, SCPE, EUROCAT. European Perinatal Health Report. Health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010. Paris (France): EURO-PERISTAT; 2010.
-
- Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964;24:266–8.
-
- Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Martin JN, Devoe LD. Bishop score: a poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. South Med J 1998;91:248–52.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical