A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field
- PMID: 31404057
- PMCID: PMC6699798
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384
A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field
Abstract
Citation metrics are widely used and misused. We have created a publicly available database of 100,000 top scientists that provides standardized information on citations, h-index, coauthorship-adjusted hm-index, citations to papers in different authorship positions, and a composite indicator. Separate data are shown for career-long and single-year impact. Metrics with and without self-citations and ratio of citations to citing papers are given. Scientists are classified into 22 scientific fields and 176 subfields. Field- and subfield-specific percentiles are also provided for all scientists who have published at least five papers. Career-long data are updated to end of 2017 and to end of 2018 for comparison.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. JPAI is a member of the editorial board of PLoS Biology. Jeroen Baas is an Elsevier employee. Elsevier runs Scopus, which is the source of this data, and also runs Mendeley Data where the database is now stored.
Comment in
-
Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in new database.Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7771):578-579. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02479-7. Nature. 2019. PMID: 31455906 No abstract available.
-
Complementary Medicine Has Reached the Centre of Scientific Interest: Some Thoughts on Ioannidis' Citation Database.Complement Med Res. 2019;26(6):373-375. doi: 10.1159/000504467. Epub 2019 Nov 18. Complement Med Res. 2019. PMID: 31739304 No abstract available.
References
-
- Fowler JH, Aksnes DW. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics 2007;72:427–437.
-
- Archambault, E., Caruso, J., & Beauchesne, O. (2011). Towards a multilingual, comprehensive and open scientific journal ontology. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 66–77.
-
- Schotten M., el Aisati M., Meester W., Steiginga S., & Ross C. (2017). A Brief History of Scopus: The World’s Largest Abstract and Citation Database of Scientific Literature In Cantu-Ortiz F., Research Analytics. Boosting University Productivity and Competitiveness through Scientometrics.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
