Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;2(6):371-376.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.341.

Community engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: Benefits, barriers, and measurement

Linda Sprague Martinez  1 , Kelsi Carolan  1 , Arden O'Donnell  1 , Yareliz Diaz  2 , Elmer R Freeman  2
Affiliations

Community engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: Benefits, barriers, and measurement

Linda Sprague Martinez et al. J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: This study employed the Delphi method, an exploratory method used for group consensus building, to determine the benefits and challenges associated with community engagement in patient-centered outcomes research.

Methods: A series of email surveys were sent to the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)-funded researchers (n = 103) in New England. Consensus was achieved through gathering themes and engaging participants in ranking their level of agreement over three rounds. In round one, participant responses were coded thematically and then tallied. In round two participants were asked to state their level of agreement with each of the themes using a Likert scale. Finally, in round three, the group was asked to rank the round two themes based on potential impact.

Results: Results suggested the greatest benefit of community engagement is that it brings multiple perspectives to the table, with 92% ranking it as the first or second most important contribution. Time was ranked as the most significant barrier to engaging community. Strategies to overcome barriers to community engagement include engaging key stakeholders early in the research, being kind and respectful and spending time with stakeholders. The most significant finding was that no researchers reported having specific measures to evaluate community engagement.

Conclusion: Community engagement can enhance both research relevance and methodology when researchers are engaged in meaningful collaborations. Advancing the science of community engagement will require the development of evaluation metrics to examine the multiple domains of partnership.

Keywords: Delphi method; PCORI; community partnerships; implementation; patient centered outcomes research; policy and community engagement; stakeholder engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA 2012; 307(15): 1583–1584. - PubMed
    1. Patient-centered outcomes research institute. About Us: Research done differently. Retrieved from https://www.pcori.org/about-us. Accessed June 26, 2017.
    1. Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health 2008; 29(1): 325–350. - PubMed
    1. Strand KJ, Cutworth N, Stoecker R, et al. Community-based Research and Higher Education: Principles and Practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
    1. Wallerstein N, Duran B. Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion and Practice 2006; 7(3): 312–323. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources