Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Oct;54(20):1195-1201.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100393. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

Association of high amounts of physical activity with mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Association of high amounts of physical activity with mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kim Blond et al. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review and analyse studies of high amounts of physical activity and mortality risk in the general population.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria related to follow-up (minimum 2 years), outcome (mortality from all causes, cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD) or coronary heart disease), exposure (eg, a category of >1000 metabolic equivalent of task (MET) min/week), study design (prospective cohort, nested case control or case-cohort) and reports of cases and person years of exposure categories.

Information sources: Systematic searches were conducted in Embase and Pubmed from database inception to 2 March 2019.

Risk of bias: The quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Included studies: From 31 368 studies identified, 48 were included. Two authors independently extracted outcome estimates and assessed study quality.

Synthesis of results: We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using random effect restricted cubic spline dose-response meta-analyses. Compared with the recommended level of physical activity (750 MET min/week), mortality risk was lower at physical activity levels exceeding the recommendations, at least until 5000 MET min/week for all cause mortality (HR=0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.94) and for CVD mortality (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.95).

Strengths and limitations of evidence: The strengths of this study include the detailed dose-response analyses, inclusion of 48 studies and examination of sources of heterogeneity. The limitations include the observational nature of the included studies and the inaccurate estimations of amount of physical activity.

Interpretation: Compared with the recommended level, mortality risk was lower at physical activity levels well above the recommended target range. Further, there was no threshold beyond which lifespan was compromised.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42017055727.

Keywords: cardiovascular; death; meta-analysis; physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MR-L: grants from the Danish Diabetes Academy, funded by the Novo Nordic Foundation, outside the submitted work.