Matching pennies games as asymmetric models of conflict
- PMID: 31407979
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X19000864
Matching pennies games as asymmetric models of conflict
Abstract
De Dreu and Gross (D&G) seem to have disregarded some relevant experimental literature on games of conflict, most notably variations on "matching pennies" games. While in such games, "attacker" and "defender" are typically not explicitly labelled, players' differentiated roles yield naturally to such notions. These studies partly validate some of D&G's findings and interpretations.
Comment in
-
Asymmetric conflict: Structures, strategies, and settlement.Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Aug 13;42:e145. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1900116X. Behav Brain Sci. 2019. PMID: 31407991
Comment on
-
Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural mechanisms for attack and defense within and between groups.Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Sep 25;42:e116. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18002170. Behav Brain Sci. 2018. PMID: 30251617 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
