Attack versus defense: A strategic rationale for role differentiation in conflict
- PMID: 31407989
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X19000888
Attack versus defense: A strategic rationale for role differentiation in conflict
Abstract
Is there a strategic mechanism that explains role-contingent differences in conflict behavior? I sketch a theory in which differences in optimal behavior for attackers and defenders arise under initially symmetric conditions through the dynamic accumulation of differences in the distributions of traits in the subpopulations of potential opponents.
Comment on
-
Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural mechanisms for attack and defense within and between groups.Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Sep 25;42:e116. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18002170. Behav Brain Sci. 2018. PMID: 30251617 Review.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
