Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 18:12:2191-2199.
doi: 10.2147/IDR.S203740. eCollection 2019.

High dose of vancomycin plus gentamicin incorporated acrylic bone cement decreased the elution of vancomycin

Affiliations

High dose of vancomycin plus gentamicin incorporated acrylic bone cement decreased the elution of vancomycin

Tao Li et al. Infect Drug Resist. .

Abstract

Purpose: Low doses of vancomycin and gentamicin were commonly incorporated into acrylic bone cement (antibiotic-impregnated bone cement, AIBC) during revision arthroplasty. Previous studies showed that only a very small amount of antibiotics could be eluted from AIBC. Given the fact that a high dose of antibiotic would elute high concentration of antibiotic, this study investigated the influence of a high dose of dual-antibiotic loading on the properties of cement.

Methods: A total of 8 groups of AIBC containing either gentamicin or vancomycin or both with different amounts of antibiotics (1 g, 2 g and 4 g) were tested on material properties, elution profiles, antibacterial activity and cytological toxicity.

Results: A high dose of gentamicin and vancomycin AIBC (with 2 g gentamicin and 2 g vancomycin loaded) regiment showed acceptable compressive strength of 74.25±0.72 MPa. No cytotoxicity or antibacterial activity reduction was observed in any group tested in this study. The elution profiles indicated that incorporating 2 g vancomycin resulted in 4.77% (1049.57±3.74 μg) released after 28 days. However, after 2 g gentamicin was added, the vancomycin released was significantly reduced to 2.42% (532.24±1.77 μg) (p<0.001), approximately 50% reduction. No significant influence of vancomycin on gentamicin was observed.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the addition of 2 g vancomycin and 2 g gentamicin into acrylic bone cement was preferred while considering this dual-antibiotic AIBC regiment with acceptably material properties and effective antibacterial activity. However, special attention should be drawn to the reduction of vancomycin elution when incorporated with gentamicin.

Keywords: antibacterial activity; antibiotic impregnated bone cement; elution; mechanical characteristic; toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The elution profiles (mean ± SD) of gentamicin (A) and vancomycin (B) over a 28-day period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Compressive strength (A) and compressive modulus (B) of tested cement. The dashed line on the left represents the lower limit of 70 MPa established by ISO 5833.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The accumulated gentamicin (circle) and vancomycin (square) released from cement tested as a function of porosity. The dashed cycles represent the four pairs of data generated from G1V1 and G2V2. The solid and dashed lines show the trend between porosity and accumulated antibiotic elution.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Antimicrobial activity of cement tested in this study. The pie chart represents these three bacteria that were the most commonly found in periprosthetic joint infection. Different colors represent different levels of bacterial growth as illustrated in the figure. Abbreviations: S. aureus: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300; E. feacalis: Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212; E. coli: Escherichia coli ATCC 35218.

References

    1. Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:e1–e25. doi:10.1093/cid/cis803 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Lowik CAM, Knobben BAS, et al. Use of gentamicin-impregnated beads or sponges in the treatment of early acute periprosthetic joint infection: a propensity score analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(12):3454–3459. doi:10.1093/jac/dky354 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kunutsor SK, Beswick AD, Whitehouse MR, et al. Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for periprosthetic joint infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. J Infect. 2018;77(6):479–488. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2018.08.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oh EJ, Oh SH, Lee IS, et al. Antibiotic-eluting hydrophilized PMMA bone cement with prolonged bactericidal effect for the treatment of osteomyelitis. J Biomater Appl. 2016;30:1534–1544. doi:10.1177/0885328216629823 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neut D, de Groot EP, Kowalski RS, et al. Gentamicin-loaded bone cement with clindamycin or fusidic acid added: biofilm formation and antibiotic release. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;73:165–170. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources