Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 8:3:15.
doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0061-x. eCollection 2019.

Predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis

Danielle A van der Windt  1 , Danielle L Burke  1 , Opeyemi Babatunde  1 , Miriam Hattle  1 , Cliona McRobert  2 , Chris Littlewood  1 , Gwenllian Wynne-Jones  1 , Linda Chesterton  1 , Geert J M G van der Heijden  3 , Jan C Winters  4 , Daniel I Rhon  5 , Kim Bennell  6 , Edward Roddy  1   7 , Carl Heneghan  8 , David Beard  9 , Jonathan L Rees  9 , Richard D Riley  1
Affiliations

Predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis

Danielle A van der Windt et al. Diagn Progn Res. .

Abstract

Background: Shoulder pain is one of the most common presentations of musculoskeletal pain with a 1-month population prevalence of between 7 and 26%. The overall prognosis of shoulder pain is highly variable with 40% of patients reporting persistent pain 1 year after consulting their primary care clinician. Despite evidence for prognostic value of a range of patient and disease characteristics, it is not clear whether these factors also predict (moderate) the effect of specific treatments (such as corticosteroid injection, exercise, or surgery).

Objectives: This study aims to identify predictors of treatment effect (i.e. treatment moderators or effect modifiers) by investigating the association between a number of pre-defined individual-level factors and the effects of commonly used treatments on shoulder pain and disability outcomes.

Methods: This will be a meta-analysis using individual participant data (IPD). Eligible trials investigating the effectiveness of advice and analgesics, corticosteroid injection, physiotherapy-led exercise, psychological interventions, and/or surgical treatment in patients with shoulder conditions will be identified from systematic reviews and an updated systematic search for trials, and risk of bias will be assessed. Authors of all eligible trials will be approached for data sharing. Outcomes measured will be shoulder pain and disability, and our previous work has identified candidate predictors. The main analysis will be conducted using hierarchical one-stage IPD meta-analysis models, examining the effect of treatment-predictor interaction on outcome for each of the candidate predictors and describing relevant subgroup effects where significant interaction effects are detected. Random effects will be used to account for clustering and heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses will be based on (i) exclusion of trials at high risk of bias, (ii) use of restricted cubic splines to model potential non-linear associations for candidate predictors measured on a continuous scale, and (iii) the use of a two-stage IPD meta-analysis framework.

Discussion: Our study will collate, appraise, and synthesise IPD from multiple studies to examine potential predictors of treatment effect in order to assess the potential for better and more efficient targeting of specific treatments for individuals with shoulder pain.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018088298.

Keywords: Disability; Individual participant data meta-analysis; Pain; Predictors of treatment effect; Shoulder conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsGW-J sits on the NICE Guideline Review Panel “Workplace health: Long-term sickness absence and capability for work”. CL receives payment for courses on the assessment and treatment of rotator cuff related shoulder pain.

References

    1. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(1):1211–1259. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, Burdorf A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, Verhaar JA. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):73–81. doi: 10.1080/03009740310004667. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greving K, Dorrestijn O, Winters JC, Groenhof F, van der Meer K, Stevens M, Diercks RL. Incidence, prevalence, and consultation rates of shoulder complaints in general practice. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41(2):150–155. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2011.605390. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft P. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-144. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson J, Helliwell P, Morton V, Adebajo A, Dickson J, Russell I, Torgerson D. Shoulder acute pain in primary healthcare: is retraining effective for GP principals? SAPPHIRE--a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47(12):1795–1802. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken360. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources