Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 6;13(1):100.
doi: 10.1186/s13065-019-0623-6. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Identification of novel antifungal agents: antimicrobial evaluation, SAR, ADME-Tox and molecular docking studies of a series of imidazole derivatives

Affiliations

Identification of novel antifungal agents: antimicrobial evaluation, SAR, ADME-Tox and molecular docking studies of a series of imidazole derivatives

Btissam Bouchal et al. BMC Chem. .

Abstract

Thirty-four imidazole-based compounds synthesized by one-pot catalytic method were evaluated for their antifungal and antibacterial activities against several fungal and bacterial strains. None of the compounds had antibacterial activity. Interestingly, compounds 1, 2, 3, 10 and 15 displayed a strong antifungal activity against all the tested fungal species, while compounds 5, 7, 9, 11, 21 and 27 showed a moderate antifungal activity. To better understand the biological activity of the most active compounds ADME-Tox and molecular docking studies were carried out. Interestingly, compounds 1, 2, 3, 7, 10 and 15 showed excellent bioavailability. In addition, compounds 1, 2 and 3, exhibited good toxicity profiles. Docking studies of the two most active compounds 2 (IC50 of 95 ± 7.07 μM) and 10 (IC50 of 235 ± 7.07 μM) suggested that they might act by inhibiting the fungal lanosterol 14α-demethylase. Therefore, these novel antifungal agents merit further characterization for the development of new antifungal therapeutics.

Keywords: ADME–Tox; Antibacterial; Antifungal; Docking; Imidazole; Structure–activity relationship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Synthetic route and structure of the molecules studied in this paper
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Antifungal activity of the studied compounds against Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans and Candida krusei. Cells were cultured in the presence of 500 µM of each compound for 24 h and growth rate was then assayed by the OD600. Growth in the presence of compound was expressed as a percentage relative to the untreated control. All experiments were carried out in triplicate and means were calculated ± SD. *p < 0.05 versus untreated control
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Binding mode of compounds 2 (a) and 10 (b) with target enzyme CYP51 from S. cerevisiae

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The top 10 causes of death. World Health Organization. 2018. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-.... Accessed 13 Feb 2019
    1. Smith KF, Goldberg M, Rosenthal S, Carlson L, Chen J, Chen C, et al. Global rise in human infectious disease outbreaks. J Royal Soc Interface. 2014;11(101):20140950. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0950. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies J, Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74(3):417–433. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00016-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gandra S, Barter D, Laxminarayan R. Economic burden of antibiotic resistance: how much do we really know? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(10):973–980. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12798. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrigach F, Rokni Y, Takfaoui A, Khoutoul M, Doucet H, Asehraou A, Touzani R. In vitro screening, homology modeling and molecular docking studies of some pyrazole and imidazole derivatives. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:653–661. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.061. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources