Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;32(6):963-970.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00256-6.

Building Three-Dimensional Intracranial Aneurysm Models from 3D-TOF MRA: a Validation Study

Affiliations

Building Three-Dimensional Intracranial Aneurysm Models from 3D-TOF MRA: a Validation Study

Turker Acar et al. J Digit Imaging. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

To create realistic three-dimensional (3D) vascular models from 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (3D-TOF MRA) of an intracranial aneurysm (IA). Thirty-two IAs in 31 patients were printed using 3D-TOF MRA source images from polylactic acid (PLA) raw material. Two observers measured the maximum IA diameter at the longest width twice separately. A total mean of four measurements as well as each observer's individual average MRA lengths were calculated. After printing, 3D-printed anatomic models (PAM) underwent computed tomography (CT) acquisition and each observer measured them using the same algorithm as applied to MRA. Inter- and intra-observer consistency for the MRA and CT measurements were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and a Bland-Altman plot. The mean maximum aneurysm diameter obtained from four MRA evaluations was 8.49 mm, whereas it was 8.83 mm according to the CT 3D PAM measurement. The Wilcoxon test revealed slightly larger mean CT 3D PAM diameters than the MRA measurements. The Spearman's correlation test yielded a positive correlation between MRA and CT lengths of 3D PAMs. Inter and intra-observer consistency were high in consecutive MRA and CT measurements. According to Bland-Altman analyses, the aneurysmal dimensions obtained from CT were higher for observer 1 and observer 2 (a mean of 0.32 mm and 0.35 mm, respectively) compared to the MRA measurements. CT dimensions were slightly overestimated compared to MRA measurements of the created models. We believe the discrepancy may be related to the Laplacian algorithm applied for surface smoothing and the high slice thickness selection that was used. However, ICC provided high consistency and reproducibility in our cohort. Therefore, it is technically possible to produce 3D intracranial aneurysm models from 3D-TOF MRA images.

Keywords: 3D-TOF magnetic resonance angiography; Intracranial aneurysm; Three-dimensional printing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ac 3D TOF MRI of a 74-year-old-man with saccular intracerebral aneurysm arising from terminal ICA is depicted. Axial (a), sagittal (b), and coronal (c) images (arrows) show aneurysmal outpouching
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a, b Image shows segmentation and data extraction process (pre-smoothing) from 3D TOF MRA data set with 3D Slicer software (a). Image depicts surface extraction and model processing (post-smoothing) of digital model via Z Brush software (b)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Photographic image of 3D-printed anatomic model (arrow) created from polylactic acid raw material
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ad CT scan of the model is shown in axial (a), sagittal (b), coronal (c), and 3D reconstruction (d) images
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a, b Graphic demonstrates intracranial aneurysm MRA averages of observers 1 and 2 for two consecutive measurements (a). Graphic reveals CT diameter means of 3D-printed anatomical model averaged by observers 1 and 2 for two serial measurements (b)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
a, b Bland-Altman plots of the mean differences between CT and MRA diameter means of 3D-printed anatomical models averaged by observer 1 (a) and observer 2 (b)

References

    1. AHA aneurysms description. What you should know about cerebral aneurysms. Cited April 2018. Available from: https://www.strokeassociation.org/en/about-stroke/types-of-stroke/hemorr...
    1. Fifi JT, Meyers PM, Lavine SD, Cox V, Silverberg L, Mangla S, Pile-Spellman J. Complications of modern diagnostic cerebral angiography in an academic medical center. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:442–447. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.01.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wurm G, Tomancok B, Pogady P, Holl K, Trenkler J. Cerebrovascular stereolithographic biomodeling for aneurysm surgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:139–145. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.1.0139. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wurm G, Lehner M, Tomancok B, Kleiser R, Nussbaumer K. Cerebrovascular biomodeling for aneurysm surgery: simulation-based training by means of rapid prototyping technologies. Surg Innov. 2011;18:294–306. doi: 10.1177/1553350610395031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kimura T, Morita A, Nishimura K, Aiyama H, Itoh H, Fukaya S, Sora S, Ochiai C. Simulation of and training for cerebral aneurysm clipping with 3-dimensional models. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:719–725. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000354350.88899.07. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types