Exploring identity and personal meanings in psychosis using the repertory grid technique: A systematic review
- PMID: 31412423
- DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2394
Exploring identity and personal meanings in psychosis using the repertory grid technique: A systematic review
Abstract
Current research and clinical practice in person-centred approaches highlight the importance of self, identity, and personal meanings in psychosis. Previous research has focused on dimensions of self, but less attention has been paid to the personal meanings involved in identity. The personal construct theory framework and the repertory grid technique (RGT) allow the study of identity and personal meanings within person-centred approaches of psychopathology and treatment in psychosis, as suggested by studies that began more than 40 years ago. However, their contributions have not yet been reviewed. We aimed to systematically review the evidence for the role of identity and personal meanings in psychotic disorders. We performed a systematic search using personal construct and RGT terms in PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, and Google Scholar. After identifying 2,574 articles, 15 were included. Nine studies followed an idiographic assessment, and six were nomothetic. Patients reported their subjective experience of isolation in terms of high self-ideal discrepancy and high perceived discrepancy with their significant others, which some studies associated with a lower degree of recovery or with the way in which positive symptoms were construed. Self-fragmentation either decreased with interventions or was associated with recovery. Evidence regarding interpersonal construing was less consistent, but there was a tendency for patients to show a more rigid cognitive structure than controls. To conclude, we found some evidence that self-discrepancies, fragmentation of self, and interpersonal construing are affected in psychosis and potentially modifiable through psychotherapy.
Keywords: construal; person-centred approach; repertory grid; schizophrenia; self.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adams-Webber, J. R. (1998). Differentiation and sociality in terms of elicited and provided constructs. Psychological Science, 9(6), 499-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00092
-
- American Psychiatric Association. (2014). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association. DSM. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.744053
-
- Badesha, J., & Horley, J. (2000). Self-construal among psychiatric outpatients: A test of the golden section. The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 73 Pt 4, 547-551. Retrieved from. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11140794
-
- Bannister, D. (1960). Conceptual structure in thought-disordered schizophrenics. Journal of Mental Science, 106(445), 1230-1249. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.106.445.1230
-
- Beck, A. T., Himelstein, R., & Grant, P. M. (2019). In and out of schizophrenia: Activation and deactivation of the negative and positive schemas. Schizophrenia Research, 203, 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2017.10.046
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
