Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Oct;23(4):555-74.

The effect of competition on nursing home expenditures under prospective reimbursement

Affiliations

The effect of competition on nursing home expenditures under prospective reimbursement

J A Nyman. Health Serv Res. 1988 Oct.

Abstract

The for-profit nursing home's incentive to minimize costs has been maligned as a major cause of the quality problems that have traditionally plagued the nursing home care industry. Yet, profit-maximizing firms in other industries are able to produce products of adequate quality. In most other industries, however, firms are constrained from reducing costs to the point where quality suffers by the threat of losing business to competing firms. In the nursing home industry, competition for patients often does not exist because of the shortage of nursing home beds. As a result, one would expect that nursing homes located in areas where there is excess demand would spend less on patient care than homes located where the bed supply is relatively abundant. This hypothesis is tested using Wisconsin data from 1983. It is found that, in counties with relatively tight bed supplies, an additional empty bed in all the homes in the county will force each home to increase expenditures by $.62 per day for each patient in the home. Overall, the average nursing home located in underbedded markets would spend $5.12 more per patient day or about $240,000 more annually (in 1983 dollars) if it were located in a market where it was forced to compete for patients. The implications for public policy are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Inquiry. 1972 Sep;9(3):3-15 - PubMed
    1. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1979 Fall;4(3):414-34 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1981 Nov;19(11):1095-107 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(8):887-98 - PubMed
    1. Health Serv Res. 1983 Summer;18(2 Pt 2):285-308 - PubMed