Predictors of Clinical Benefits and One-Year Functional Outcomes Following Shoulder Arthroplasty
- PMID: 31413677
- PMCID: PMC6604540
Predictors of Clinical Benefits and One-Year Functional Outcomes Following Shoulder Arthroplasty
Abstract
Background: Shoulder arthroplasty has been shown to improve function in patients with advanced shoulder disease. However, the response to surgery and final outcomes are not easily predictable. This study assessed the effect of residual pain, age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, and depression on changes and status at one-year following arthroplasty with respect to shoulder function and overall physical and mental health status.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of 140 patients tested preoperatively and one-year following shoulder arthroplasty was conducted at our tertiary hospital. Pearson's correlations and multiple regression analysis were performed to test the impact of predictors on shoulder pain and function assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) questionnaire, and on physical and mental health assessed using the Short Form-12.
Results: Pain and female sex were significant predictors of poorer function at one-year (R = .56, p = .001); and with other predictors, they explained 32% of the variability in function. The explained variability of changes in function scores was 15% with pain being the only significant predictor. Physical health was lower in older patients (r = -.31, p < .05) and was less predictable for physical health change scores (12%) and the physical status at one-year (14%).
Conclusions: Residual pain is associated with poorer function status and less clinical benefits. Female sex is not associated with less change in function which suggests that men and women get equal benefit from the surgery. Advanced age relates to poorer physical health and to a lesser extent physical change over the year.Level of Evidence: III.
Keywords: function; physical health status; shoulder arthroplasty.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures: The authors report no potential conflicts of interest related to this study.
References
-
- Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. JBJS. 2011;93:2249–54. - PubMed
-
- Fehringer EV, Kopjar B, Boorman RS, Churchill RS, Smith KL, Matsen III FA. Characterizing the functional improvement after total shoulder arthro-plasty for osteoarthritis. JBJS. 2002;84:1349–53. - PubMed
-
- Orfaly RM, Rockwood CA, Esenyel CZ, Wirth MA. A prospective functional outcome study of shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. J shoulder Elb Surg. 2003;12:214–21. - PubMed
-
- Matsen III FA, Antoniou J, Rozencwaig R, Campbell B, Smith KL. Correlates with comfort and function after total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative joint disease. J shoulder Elb Surg. 2000;9:465–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources