Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Aug 14;10(1):78.
doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0759-x.

Role of imaging in the evaluation of vascular complications after liver transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Role of imaging in the evaluation of vascular complications after liver transplantation

Juan-José Delgado-Moraleda et al. Insights Imaging. .

Abstract

Clinical manifestations of liver transplantation complications can be subtle and non-specific. Medical imaging, mainly Doppler ultrasound, plays an important role to detect and grade these. Colour Doppler ultrasound exams are routinely performed at 24-48 h, on the 7th day, the first and third month after transplantation. MDCT and MR images are acquired based on the Doppler ultrasound (DUS) findings, even in the absence of abnormal liver function. As vascular complications appear early after surgery, DUS should be performed by experience personnel. Diagnostic angiography is seldom performed. This pictorial review illustrates the key imaging findings of vascular complications in patients with liver transplantation: hepatic artery complications (such as thrombosis, stenosis of the anastomosis and pseudoaneurysms), portal vein abnormalities (such as occlusion and stenosis) and hepatic veins and/or inferior vena cava flow changes (Budd-Chiari syndrome).

Keywords: Doppler ultrasound; Graft complications; Liver imaging; Liver transplantation; Vascular abnormalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Luis Marti-Bonmati is the Editor-in-Chief of Insights into Imaging. All the other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a, b US control. Postoperative CDUS is performed at 24 h, 48 h, 1 day, and 7 days after surgery. Images show a normal portal and hepatic artery flow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Anastomotic thrombosis. Artery thrombosis is the most serious complication of orthotopic liver transplantation. It can be demonstrated as an absence of flow in Doppler ultrasound examination (a). CT can depict the thrombus and also the absence of distal flow (b). Multiplanar reconstructions and volume rendering images can be useful to ensure diagnosis (ce)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a, b After treatment control. Control performed after thrombolysis and angioplasty of patient in Fig. 2. Normal arterial flow is seen. Resistive index shows normal values (0.6)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The usefulness of spectral curves on the assessment of hepatic artery stenosis. Even in cases of normal colour Doppler examination (a), spectral curves should be obtained. They show a characteristic pattern before and after the stenosis. In the prestenotic segment (b), we can appreciate high peaks and an elevated resistive index. In the poststenotic segment (c), we can see a parvus et tardus pulse and a low resistive index. Angiography can help confirm the diagnosis (d) and perform the treatment (e)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Multifocal stenosis. The hepatic artery can present more than one point of stenosis. In these cases, each one should be treated separately. In this example, angiography demonstrated two points of stenosis (a, b). Two stents were placed for treatment. Control CT showed that stents had been correctly placed and there is distal artery flow as seen in the MIP reconstruction (c) and in volume rendering reconstruction (d)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Hepatic artery stenosis leading to splenic artery steal syndrome. Postsurgical US shows a turbulent flow of the hepatic vein. The hepatic artery cannot be clearly identified (a). An arterial phase CT is performed, showing severe focal stenosis of the hepatic artery and filiform enhancement of its branches (b, c). The increased size of the splenic artery should also be noted. Increased splenic artery blood flow explains the increased turbulent portal flow. Angiography confirms both stenosis of the hepatic artery and the increased size of the splenic artery (d, e). Distal embolisation of the splenic artery was performed as a treatment
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm. Pseudoaneurysms can be discovered using ultrasound (a). It shows a characteristics appearance in Doppler ultrasound, due to the turbulent forward and backward flow (b). Arterial phase CT shows arterial enhancement of the pseudoaneurysm (c). A coil is placed to block entering the blood and to prevent rupture (d).
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Intrahepatic artery pseudoaneurysm complicated with portal fistula. On these images, an intrahepatic false aneurysm is presented. It shows turbulent flow on colour Doppler examination (a) and arterial enhancement on CT (b). One of the possible complications of this entity is the development of portal or biliary fistulas. In this case, a porta fistula is seen (portal branches show arterial enhancement). Multiplanar and volumetric reconstructions help to find the exact location of the fistula (ce).
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Portal vein thrombosis. Echogenic material is observed on ultrasound examination (a). This finding is confirmed in axial CT (b). Multiplanar reconstructions help in the assessment of the extension (c)
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Usefulness of spectral curves on the assessment of portal vein stenosis. Ultrasound examination shows multiple points of stenosis (a). Colour Doppler demonstrates turbulent flow (b). Spectral curves show a characteristic pattern before and at the stenosis. In the prestenotic segment (c), we can appreciate a low flow. In the stenotic segment (d), high-speed flow is seen (peak velocity over 125 cm/s). Stenotic/prestenotic ratio is a useful measurement. In this case, the result is clearly more than three
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Portal vein stenosis. Portal vein stenosis is demonstrated on CT, both on axial images (a) and in multiplanar reconstructions (b). After stent placement, a control ultrasound is performed (c). It shows normalisation of the portal flow. Control MRI (d) shows metallic artefact of the stent. Normal contrast enhancement is seen both proximal and distal to the stent
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
a, b Thrombosis of the inferior vena cava. Thrombosis of the inferior vena cava was discovered through an axial ultrasound examination. Sagittal examination helps to asses its extension.
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
a, b Stenosis of the inferior vena cava. Stenosis of the inferior vena cava is seen on the axial and sagittal images. It affects hepatic vein confluence. Difficulty with venous drainage produces ascites. Percutaneous angioplasty is performed for treatment
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
a, b Thrombosis of the right hepatic vein. The right suprahepatic vein is more echogenic than the middle hepatic vein. After contrast administration, there is an enhancement of the middle hepatic vein, showing normal flow. The right hepatic vein does not enhance because of thrombosis

References

    1. Monti L, Soglia G, Tomà P. Imaging in pediatric liver transplantation. Radiol Med. 2016;121:378–390. doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0628-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khalaf H. Vascular complications after deceased and living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2010;42:865–870. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.02.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duffy John P., Hong Johnny C., Farmer Douglas G., Ghobrial Rafik M., Yersiz Hasan, Hiatt Jonathan R., Busuttil Ronald W. Vascular Complications of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Experience in More than 4,200 Patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2009;208(5):896–903. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singhal Ashish, Stokes Kenneth, Sebastian Anthony, Wright Harlan I, Kohli Vivek. Endovascular treatment of hepatic artery thrombosis following liver transplantation. Transplant International. 2010;23(3):245–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.01037.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crossin JD, Muradali D, Wilson SR. US of liver transplants: normal and abnormal. Radiographics. 2003;23:1093–1114. doi: 10.1148/rg.235035031. - DOI - PubMed