Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;59(10):3264-3274.
doi: 10.1111/trf.15474. Epub 2019 Aug 15.

Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method

Affiliations

Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method

Grethe Risum Krog et al. Transfusion. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Background: In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high-throughput extended genotyping setup.

Study design and methods: We developed 35 competitive allele-specific polymerase chain reaction assays for genotyping of blood donors. Samples from 1034 Danish blood donors were genotyped, and 45,314 red blood cell antigens and 6148 platelet antigens were predicted. Predicted phenotypes were compared with 16,119 serologic phenotypes.

Results: We found 62 discrepancies of which 43 were due to serology. After exclusion of the discrepancies caused by serology, the accuracy of genotyping was 99.9%. Of 17 discrepancies caused by the genotype, three were incorrect antigen-negative predictions and could potentially, as the solitary analysis, have caused an adverse transfusion reaction.

Conclusion: We have established a robust and highly accurate blood group genotyping system with a very high capacity for screening blood donors. The system represents a significant improvement over the former serotyping-only procedure. Almost all new technology in medicine incurs increased costs, but the presented efficient genotyping system is a rare example of a significant qualitative and quantitative technologic progress that is also more cost-efficient than previous technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Anstee DJ, Klein HG, Mollison PL. Mollison's Blood transfusion in clinical medicine. 11th ed. Malden (MA): Blackwell; 2005 xv, 891 s. p.
    1. Compernolle V, Chou ST, Tanael S, et al. Red blood cell specifications for patients with hemoglobinopathies: a systematic review and guideline. Transfusion 2018;58:1555-66.
    1. van Sambeeck JHJ, de Wit PD, Luken J, et al. A conceptual framework for optimizing blood matching strategies: balancing patient complications against total costs incurred. Front Med 2018;5:199.
    1. Schonewille H, Honohan A, van der Watering LM, et al. Incidence of alloantibody formation after ABO-D or extended matched red blood cell transfusions: a randomized trial (MATCH study). Transfusion 2016;56:311-20.
    1. Storry JR, Clausen FB, Castilho L, et al. International society of blood transfusion working party on red cell immunogenetics and blood group terminology: report of the Dubai, Copenhagen and Toronto meetings. Vox Sang 2019;114, 95-102.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources