An improved method for assessing mismatches between supply and demand in urban regulating ecosystem services: A case study in Tabriz, Iran
- PMID: 31415585
- PMCID: PMC6695181
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220750
An improved method for assessing mismatches between supply and demand in urban regulating ecosystem services: A case study in Tabriz, Iran
Abstract
Regulating ecosystem services provided by urban forests are of great importance for the quality of life among city dwellers. To reach a maximum contribution to well-being in cities, the urban regulating ecosystem services (URES) must match with the demands in terms of space and time. If we understand the matches or mismatches between the current urban dwellers' desired quality conditions (demand) and the supply of URES by urban forests (UF) in the cities, this will facilitate integrating the concepts of ecosystem services in urban planning and management, but such an assessment has suffered from major knowledge limitations. Since it is complex and problematic to identify the direct demands for URES and the spatiotemporal patterns therein, improving the demand indicators can help to determine the actual requirements. In this paper, a methodological approach based on indicators is presented and demonstrated for two important URES: air quality improvement and global climate change mitigation provided by urban trees and shrubs. Four air quality standards and greenhouse gas reduction targets were used and compared to supplies of the URES in Tabriz, Iran. Our results show that the mean contribution of the URES supply to air quality standards and greenhouse gas reduction targets is modest. Hence, in Tabriz, there is a strong mismatch between demand and supply. Mismatches at the city scale will have to be reduced by both a reduction in pollutant emissions and an increased provisioning of URES supply through urban greenery. The presented assessment approach and the results for Tabriz make it explicit how different the demands and supplies of the two studied URES are, and we expect similar mismatches in many other cities. Therefore, our approach, relatively simple but still realistic and easy-to-apply, can raise awareness about, and the utility of, the ecosystem services concepts for urban planning and policymaking.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Mapping supply of and demand for ecosystem services to assess environmental justice in New York City.Ecol Appl. 2021 Sep;31(6):e02390. doi: 10.1002/eap.2390. Epub 2021 Jul 26. Ecol Appl. 2021. PMID: 34142407 Free PMC article.
-
Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain.Ambio. 2014 May;43(4):466-79. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x. Ambio. 2014. PMID: 24740618 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges for tree officers to enhance the provision of regulating ecosystem services from urban forests.Environ Res. 2017 Jul;156:97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Mar 22. Environ Res. 2017. PMID: 28342350
-
Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices.Environ Pollut. 2011 Aug-Sep;159(8-9):2078-87. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 11. Environ Pollut. 2011. PMID: 21316130 Review.
-
Quantitative remote sensing of forest ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa's urban landscapes: a review.Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Mar 4;194(4):242. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-09904-x. Environ Monit Assess. 2022. PMID: 35243559 Review.
Cited by
-
Prioritizing the provision of urban ecosystem services in deprived areas, a question of environmental justice.Ambio. 2021 May;50(5):1035-1046. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01438-1. Epub 2020 Nov 26. Ambio. 2021. PMID: 33244744 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand (Mis)Matches for Differential City Management in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 31;18(15):8130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158130. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34360422 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Geijzendorffer IR, Martín-López B, Roche PK. Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments. Ecol Indic. Elsevier Ltd; 2015;52: 320–331. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.016 - DOI
-
- Schröter M, Barton DN, Remme RP, Hein L. Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecol Indic. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;36: 539–551. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018 - DOI
-
- Carpenter SR, Mooney H a, Agard J, Capistrano D, Defries RS, Diaz S, et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 1305–1312. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2635788&tool=p...http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id... 10.1073/pnas.0808772106 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, et al. Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ. 2009;7: 21–28. 10.1890/080025 - DOI
-
- Bastian O, Haase D, Grunewald K. Ecosystem properties, potentials and services—The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecol Indic. Elsevier Ltd; 2012;21: 7–16. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical