Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov 12;140(20):1661-1678.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040631. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Acute Nonischemic Myocardial Injury

Affiliations
Review

Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Acute Nonischemic Myocardial Injury

Andrew P DeFilippis et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Although coronary thrombus overlying a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque has long been considered the hallmark and the primary therapeutic target for acute myocardial infarction (MI), multiple other mechanisms are now known to cause or contribute to MI. It is further recognized that an MI is just one of many types of acute myocardial injury. The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction provides a taxonomy for acute myocardial injury, including 5 subtypes of MI and nonischemic myocardial injury. The diagnosis of MI is reserved for patients with myocardial ischemia as the cause of myocardial injury, whether attributable to acute atherothrombosis (type 1 MI) or supply/demand mismatch without acute atherothrombosis (type 2 MI). Myocardial injury in the absence of ischemia is categorized as acute or chronic nonischemic myocardial injury. However, optimal evaluation and treatment strategies for these etiologically distinct diagnoses have yet to be defined. Herein, we review the epidemiology, risk factor associations, and diagnostic tools that may assist in differentiating between nonischemic myocardial injury, type 1 MI, and type 2 MI. We identify limitations, review new research, and propose a framework for the diagnostic and therapeutic approach for patients who have suspected MI or other causes of myocardial injury.

Keywords: heart injuries; myocardial infarction; myocardial ischemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Myocardial injury taxonomy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
All-cause mortality in cohort studies of patients with type 1 myocardial infarction (MI), type 2 MI, or myocardial injury. Size of bubble indicates the number of patients in the study (small <1000, medium <3000, large >3000) with color representing diagnosis (type 1 MI=red, type 2 MI=blue, myocardial injury=purple). Label indicates lead author from cohort. *In most of the depicted studies, the category of myocardial injury was aimed at capturing acute nonischemic myocardial injury.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Peak cardiac troponin concentration among patients with type 1 myocardial infarction (MI), type 2 MI, or nonischemic myocardial injury.,,, Boxes represent medians and interquartile ranges, whiskers display the maximum and minimum values. All units standardized to micrograms per liter with y axis transformed as log10. *In most of the depicted studies, the category of myocardial injury was aimed at capturing acute nonischemic myocardial injury.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Systematic approach to the evaluation, classification, and treatment of patients presenting with evidence of myocardial injury. Gradation of coloring represents the gradation of assessed probability of myocardial ischemia (orange) and type 1 MI (red), with darker coloring representing higher likelihood.ASCVD indicates atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CAD, coronary artery disease; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; cTn, cardiac troponin; HF, heart failure; MI, myocardial infarction; and UDMI, Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Proposed conceptual paradigm for the evaluation and treatment of patients presenting with symptoms and signs of myocardial infarction. Gradation of coloring represents the gradation of assessed probability of type 1 myocardial infarction (MI; red) and diagnostic iatrogenic risk (blue), with darker coloring representing higher likelihood. Dotted lines represent how different combinations of different pretest probabilities of type 1 MI and risk of a diagnostic modality or treatment may impact selection of diagnostic modalities or empiric treatments. For example, patients with a low pretest probability of type 1 MI and a high risk of bleeding or contrast-induced nephropathy should not receive the same diagnostic evaluation and empiric antithrombotic treatment as a patient with a high probability of type 1 MI and a low risk for bleeding or contrast-induced nephropathy. Decisions on patients not at these extremes are more nuanced. CAD indicates coronary artery disease; cTN, cardiac troponin; GI, gastrointestinal; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; and PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

References

    1. Pitts SR, Niska RW, Xu J, Burt CW. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2006 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008:1, 38.. - PubMed
    1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129:e28–e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newby LK, Jesse RL, Babb JD, Christenson RH, De Fer TM, Diamond GA, Fesmire FM, Geraci SA, Gersh BJ, Larsen GC, et al. ACCF 2012 expert consensus document on practical clinical considerations in the interpretation of troponin elevations: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation task force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2427–2463. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.969. - PubMed
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018;138:e618–e651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617. - PubMed
    1. Luepker RV, Duval S, Jacobs DR, Jr, Smith LG, Berger AK. The effect of changing diagnostic algorithms on acute myocardial infarction rates. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21:824–829. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.08.005. - PMC - PubMed