Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Nov;85(21):8261-5.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8261.

Identification of a common chemical signal regulating the induction of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogenesis

Affiliations

Identification of a common chemical signal regulating the induction of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogenesis

P Talalay et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov.

Abstract

Carcinogenesis is blocked by an extraordinary variety of agents belonging to many different classes--e.g., phenolic antioxidants, azo dyes, polycyclic aromatics, flavonoids, coumarins, cinnamates, indoles, isothiocyanates, 1,2-dithiol-3-thiones, and thiocarbamates. The only known common property of these anticarcinogens is their ability to elevate in animal cells the activities of enzymes that inactivate the reactive electrophilic forms of carcinogens. Structure-activity studies on the induction of quinone reductase [NAD(P)H:(quinone-acceptor) oxidoreductase, EC 1.6.99.2] and glutathione S-transferases have revealed that many anti-carcinogenic enzyme inducers contain a distinctive and hitherto unrecognized chemical feature (or acquire this feature after metabolism) that regulates the synthesis of these protective enzymes. The inducers are Michael reaction acceptors characterized by olefinic (or acetylenic) bonds that are rendered electrophilic (positively charged) by conjugation with electron-withdrawing substrates. The potency of inducers parallels their efficiency in Michael reactions. Many inducers are also substrates for glutathione S-transferases, which is further evidence for their electrophilicity. These generalizations have not only provided mechanistic insight into the perplexing question of how such seemingly unrelated anticarcinogens induce chemoprotective enzymes, but also have led to the prediction of the structures of inducers with potential chemoprotective activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer Res. 1985 Sep;45(9):4219-23 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986 Mar;76(3):467-73 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1988 Sep 1;48(17):4776-82 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983 Oct;71(4):855-7 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(23):8232-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources